-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
Meetingminutes Minutes13122017
Bob Relyea edited this page Mar 4, 2025
·
1 revision
- Roll call (Tony) - quorum achieved.
- Roll call
- Review / approval of the agenda
- Review of previous meeting minutes (November 15, 2017)
- V3.0 Items (Other business to be covered in the following meetings)
- Additional ECC Curves - OID (Dieter)
- Review Spec V3 from Chris Z
- Review Mechanisms V3 form Chris Z
- Planning for review/complete
- Comment on comments list (Girish Kumar, CKA_TRUSTED). (https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/pkcs11-comment/201709/msg00000.html)
- Letter to NIST regarding AES GCM IV generation (Tony)
- New business
- Set next meeting date
- Call for late arrivals
- Adjourn
- Darren moved, Geoff seconded. No objections, comments or abstentions. Agenda approved.
- November 29, 2017
- Darren moved. Geoff seconded. No objections, comments or abstentions. Minutes approved.
- Dieter: Did not want to list all curves, it is a very long list. Updated Darren's proposal with 2 versions, what direction should we do? Darren thinks both look good, agrees with Dieter to follow 4.
- Bob seems useful to get it in. Chris can fold this in.
- Valerie would like to see it go to ballot, as it's different enough, makes TC intentions clear.
- Motion to take Dieter's draft for on ECC notes to ballot. Darren moves, Daniel seconds. No objections, abstentions or comments.
- Tony will open ballot, Dieter will update the wiki.
- Need guidance on C_EncryptCancel - where to insert it, for example. Bob R. noted it should come over C_WaitForSLotEvent().
- Please pay attention to "items edited to the document" column in the wiki - Chris needs further guidance.
- We had been doing the proposals with capital UL at the end, but the documents don't reflect that - do we want to be consistent? Any thoughts?
- Bob R.: it has to be in the header files. the document should just describe that everything is unsigned long.. Okay either way.
- Chris's inclination is to have documents match, even though it's a a lot of updates. Bob R. says it has to be that way in the headerfiles, so Chris would like to make documentation consistent with header files. No dissent, and a few voices of general agreement.
- When do we want to have first round of reviews. Valerie suggested breaking up the review sections, to make sure every page gets a set of eyes. Tony is not a fan of splitting up review pages. Tony wants to remind TC we all are behind all of documents, full document. We all have a responsibility to review the entire document.
- Bob R: Yes, we all need to review the entire document, but if you made a proposal, you need to make sure your change went in as you expected.
- TOny: Please post any questions for clarification or corrections to the list, it will encourage others to look and will help improve the document. Definitely pay extra attention to your proposals. Valerie; and if Chris needs more information, please work with him directly for that clarity.
- Tony: Mid January okay for review comments? Darren is hoping to be done sooner. No other comments.
- TOny: What about January 17th? Valerie: there is a US holiday that week, may be more realistic for January 24?
- Reconvene on the 10th to go through first rounds of comments and see ifthere are any changes to do, ready to go forward by 24 of January.
- of course, don't wait to share your comments. Getting them out before the 10th will give us some discussion points.
- Thank you, Chris, for your efforts! Without the editors, these specs don't move forward.
Comment on comments list (Girish Kumar, CKA_TRUSTED). (https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/pkcs11-comment/201709/msg00000.html)
- No progress this week
- No progress this week
- No progress this week
- Following the schedule would have our next meeting on Dec 27 - that's a holiday. After that, 10th and 24th of January. Let's meet on January 10.
- 3 arrivals noted.
- Geoff moved. Daniel seconded. No objections, comments or abstentions. Adjourned.