AI-era Product Manager expert skill for Claude Code, integrating classic methodologies with AI collaboration workflows.
- Classic Methodologies: Marty Cagan (Problem-first), Teresa Torres (Continuous Discovery), Clayton Christensen (JTBD)
- AI Collaboration Workflow: Define boundaries → AI generates draft → PM reviews → Perspective switching
- Practical Prompt Library: Ready-to-use prompts for Edge Cases, Sequence Diagrams, Risk Assessment
- Perspective Switching: Auto-generate Engineer version / Executive version of PRDs
# Copy to Claude Code skills directory
git clone https://github.com/panda/product-management-skill.git
cp -r product-management-skill ~/.claude/skills/product-managementOr use symlink (easier to update):
git clone https://github.com/panda/product-management-skill.git
ln -s $(pwd)/product-management-skill ~/.claude/skills/product-management| Method | Example |
|---|---|
| Slash command | /product-management |
| Keyword trigger | "Help me write a PRD", "Analyze this feature request" |
| Natural language | "How should I evaluate this feature?", "Plan next quarter's roadmap" |
You: I need a PRD for a user notification system
Claude: [Loads skill, asks for context/boundaries]
→ Generates draft with edge cases
→ You review and refine
→ Output: Full PRD with JSON Schema + Sequence Diagram
You: Should we add dark mode? Here's the user feedback...
Claude: [Applies RICE scoring]
→ Impact vs Effort analysis
→ Risk assessment
→ Recommendation with rationale
You: Convert this PRD for my engineering team
Claude: → Strips business context
→ Adds Mermaid sequence diagram
→ Outputs JSON Schema for API
→ Includes sample request/response
You: I need an executive summary for my CEO
Claude: → Risk Assessment Matrix
→ Business impact analysis
→ Decision points highlighted
→ Cost/benefit summary
You: What edge cases should I consider for this payment flow?
Claude: → Lists 5+ edge cases
→ Bank API timeout handling
→ Partial payment scenarios
→ Currency conversion errors
→ Refund edge cases
You: Review this PRD for consistency issues
Claude: → Scans for terminology conflicts
→ "Line 12 says 'ETH', but line 45 uses 'Ethereum' - standardize?"
→ "Amount unit inconsistent: wei (line 23) vs ETH (line 67)"
→ "Role naming: 'user' vs 'customer' vs '用戶' - pick one"
→ Outputs checklist of fixes needed
You: What risks should I flag for stakeholders?
Claude: → Cost scaling risk
"Will costs grow non-linearly with usage?
Current: $0.01/tx → At 100x volume: $2.50/tx (not $1.00)"
→ Fallback impact analysis
"If payment API fails: UX degradation or revenue loss?
Recommendation: This affects revenue - needs P0 SLA"
→ Responsibility attribution
"If AI agent makes wrong decision, who is accountable?
Flag for legal review before launch"
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. You provide: Context, Goals, Boundaries │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 2. AI generates: Draft PRD with edge cases │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 3. You review: Logic, scenarios, consistency │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 4. Iterate: Refine until complete │
└─────────────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 5. Transform: Engineer view / Executive view │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
product-management-skill/
├── SKILL.md # Main skill definition
└── references/
└── ai-prd-workflow.md # AI PRD workflow + Prompt library
| Capability | Description |
|---|---|
| PRD Writing | Quick PRD, Full PRD, Discovery Checklist |
| AI Collaboration | Define boundaries → Generate → Review → Transform |
| Feature Analysis | Impact vs Effort Matrix, RICE Scoring |
| Prompt Library | Edge Cases, Sequence Diagrams, Risk Assessment |
| Expert | Framework |
|---|---|
| Marty Cagan | Problem space vs Solution space |
| Teresa Torres | Continuous Discovery, Opportunity Trees |
| Clayton Christensen | Jobs to be Done |
AI PRD Workflow: Inspired by Darren's article on AI-augmented product management - the core concepts of "define boundaries → AI generates → PM reviews → perspective switching" and decision risk exposure.
Classic Methodologies: Supplemented with established PM frameworks:
- Marty Cagan (SVPG): Problem space vs Solution space, Discovery vs Delivery
- Teresa Torres: Continuous Discovery, Opportunity Solution Trees
- Clayton Christensen: Jobs to be Done
MIT