Deprecate RNA-seq experimental design workshop #218
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Keep only LCG workshop in 'popular' tab - Deprecate old template RNAseq workshop - Use 'RNAseq experimental design' for new template copy by susansjy22
Contributor
|
I mostly agree, but I think there are a few points in there about total RNA and ribosomal RNA which may be useful. Not sure about deprecating just yet but might be helpful to get some numbers about how many visits this page gets. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary of changes:
@egmg726 I was looking at https://melbournebioinformatics.github.io/intro-to-rna-seq/ compared to https://melbournebioinformatics.github.io/rna-seq-counts-to-genes/ and I think we should only keep the latter. It is more complete and has far more examples. Let me know what you think.