Remove Lazy from native and bytecode modes: not thread safe and sometimes SIGSEGV #229
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Angstrom (and as a consequence Uri.of_string) is not thread-safe. On OCaml 4 this actually leads to a SIGSEGV sometimes, on OCaml 5 it raises CamlinternalLazy.Undefined.
This could be fixed by adding a 'Lazy.force p |> ignore' so that the Lazy value is never observable from a concurrent/parallel context, but I prefer to remove Lazy completely, at least until the reason for the OCaml 4 segfault is understood.
Using a ref here is safe, because the ref is only changed once before 'fix_direct' returns, so it is never changed from a concurrent/parallel context. And it still preserves the optimization that Lazy did: the fixpoint is only computed once.
This avoids the crash noticed in mirage/ocaml-uri#178