-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CEDS Sector Mapping: 7BC_Indirect-N2O-non-agricultural #29
Comments
Note; this way we have 60 categories/sectors used from under the "59_Sectors_2024". Only "6B_Other-not-in-total" is ignored. |
As far as I'm aware no N2O group does endogenous concentrations. (Some may do nitrogen cycle stuff, but they will be doing an inversion based on concentrations, which is different), I'm assuming this source is small so whether we include it or not doesn't matter so much. Hence I would include it (I'm more confident that groups don't have this so it's better not to miss it than that we would inadvertently double count, although it does depend exactly what it is, do you have a full description/docs somewhere?) |
Its in EDGAR as well (which is where we pull this from), which is the main other global dataset anyone would tend to use, so modelers have seen it before. |
I assume you mean IAMs not ESMs here? Is it a small sector compared to the total (both global but also for agriculture)? Do you have a link to docs? |
I was thinking ESMs. |
Okay, can we conclude:
|
Can you send me some docs on what 7BC actually is please |
Sorry, should have done more digging myself before and added that to the top; but this is what I could find. This is IPCC2006 category 5.A.
I confirmed this with the EDGAR N2O download that Steve says CEDS is pulled from. I did not find anything in EDGAR-latest-publication or EDGAR-latest-report. |
Yes, this is the definition:
Its N2O emissions that occur as a result of deposition of anthropogenic reactive nitrogen in non-crop ecosystems. So its indirect anthropogenic N2O emissions. |
Ah ok. I'm pretty sure that's an input for all models I can think of (MAGICC plus ESMs), so yes please let's include that. (As a note, what I don't know is how this should/does relate to the nitrogen deposition product that Michaela Hegglin will produce. Let's worry about that another day.) |
Ah Gridding. We will make sure for the CMIP7 historical data treatment of 7BC_Indirect-N2O-non-agricultural-N is placed in AGR in our gridding. |
Question is: "What harmonization sector do we place '7BC_Indirect-N2O-non-agricultural' under?"
Steve (@ssmithClimate) commented on 21 Oct 2024:
"This is tricky, for ESMs with their own N-cycle would calculate this themselves. But others would need this.
We should probably put this into agriculture - if models have their own N cycle they would do all of that themselves, if they don't then they would want this.
ask the ESM groups - but I suspect few if any are doing endogenous N2O concentrations. But maybe a few?"
I suggest that we follow Steve's suggestion, and update the sector_mapping for 7BC_Indirect-N2O-non-agricultural to Agriculture (currently it has no sector).
Later, we may also want to ask around:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: