Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Type texture #3472

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024
Merged

Type texture #3472

merged 8 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

shrekshao
Copy link
Contributor

@shrekshao shrekshao commented Mar 8, 2024

First try adding to WGSL validation tests: texel_formats, storage_texture_types

Failing cases in Chrome:
- storage_texture_types: format without readWriteStorage usage didn't get rejected with 'read-write' access.

  • bgra8unorm

For other texture types (e.g. sampled textures, multisampled textures etc.) I think they need api side binding creation to test the format validation. Do we want to include that as part of these shader validation tests?


Requirements for PR author:

  • All missing test coverage is tracked with "TODO" or .unimplemented().
  • New helpers are /** documented */ and new helper files are found in helper_index.txt.
  • Test behaves as expected in a WebGPU implementation. (If not passing, explain above.)
  • Test have be tested with compatibility mode validation enabled and behave as expected. (If not passing, explain above.)

Requirements for reviewer sign-off:

  • Tests are properly located in the test tree.
  • Test descriptions allow a reader to "read only the test plans and evaluate coverage completeness", and accurately reflect the test code.
  • Tests provide complete coverage (including validation control cases). Missing coverage MUST be covered by TODOs.
  • Helpers and types promote readability and maintainability.

When landing this PR, be sure to make any necessary issue status updates.

@shrekshao shrekshao requested a review from jrprice March 8, 2024 21:53
@shrekshao shrekshao requested review from ben-clayton and removed request for jrprice March 12, 2024 18:00
@shrekshao
Copy link
Contributor Author

shrekshao commented Mar 12, 2024 via email

@shrekshao shrekshao requested a review from jrprice March 12, 2024 20:19
Copy link
Contributor

@jrprice jrprice left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@shrekshao shrekshao enabled auto-merge (squash) March 13, 2024 20:27
@shrekshao shrekshao merged commit 7b9db48 into gpuweb:main Mar 13, 2024
1 check passed
ben-clayton pushed a commit to ben-clayton/cts that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2024
* webgpu,shader,validation,types,textures

* switch param order, filter out bgra8unorm

* fix listing_meta

* add bgra8unorm

* reinterpret spec fixes

* Fix comment

* fix const
ben-clayton pushed a commit to ben-clayton/cts that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2024
* webgpu,shader,validation,types,textures

* switch param order, filter out bgra8unorm

* fix listing_meta

* add bgra8unorm

* reinterpret spec fixes

* Fix comment

* fix const
ben-clayton pushed a commit to ben-clayton/cts that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2024
* webgpu,shader,validation,types,textures

* switch param order, filter out bgra8unorm

* fix listing_meta

* add bgra8unorm

* reinterpret spec fixes

* Fix comment

* fix const
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants