-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Highly similar adjectives and their satellites #35
Comments
ewn-00488278-s: ewn-01677162-a: |
Another example is:
|
Another example:
|
I agree that these should be merged. |
Good to have @fcbond opinion. It is hard to check these cases without the words in the XML fragments. |
In the case of last #35 (comment) like #238, one is relational and the other is descriptive. |
I think we need to review this issue carefully, there seem to be very many cases of highly similar adjectives. |
What was your approach to find these similarities? I think we can try to judge the method instead of all cases trying to be less ad-hoc. |
"histrionic" carries a nuance of excess and exageration, which would be lost if it is merged with "theatrical". |
We are not going to fix this for the 2021 release.... the more I look at it the more it seems to be a huge problem, let's see about next year. |
There are some adjectives where a satellite adjective is marked as being similar to a standard adjective however the definitions are nearly indistinguishable. These should probably be merged into a single adjective synset
The synset:
Should be merged with:
The synset:
Should be merged with:
The synset:
Should be merged with:
The synset:
Should be merged with:
The synset:
Should be merged with:
The synset:
Should be merged with:
The synset:
Should be merged with:
The synset:
Should be merged with:
The synset:
Should be merged with:
The synset:
Should be merged with:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: