-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rural adjective #238
Comments
Maybe different from #35, here we have one descriptive and the other relational. |
This isn't related to #35 as neither of these adjectives are satellites. I think these should be merged, they seem indistinguishable to me. |
There are some linguistics tests to distinguish between descriptive and relational adjectives (almost all references from Christiane Fellbaum. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database):
regarding the position:
In https://www.ucl.ac.uk/internet-grammar/adjectiv/attribut.htm the attributive position is defined:
The problem is that almost all tests uses typically! ;-) The adjective rural is a hard case in the glosses. Consider the gloss below that defines the descriptive sense, that is the sense that is used to talk about properties of nouns. In the examples, we are suppose to use the sense of this same synset, the descriptive one. But (a) rural | living in or characteristic of farming or country life ; rural people ; large rural households ; unpaved rural roads ; an economy that is basically rural Few more examples: So I am not sure if they should be merged. But surely the glosses could be improved... Maybe a pattern for differentiate descriptive/relational would be nice. |
In a more radical direction, at some point, we could think of changing the way adjectives are modeled: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/GermaNet/adjectives.shtml |
After consulting Christiane Fellbaum, I also agree to merge the two synsets. |
I also don't think either of these senses are a relational sense of the adjective. It is easy to find corpus evidence of either sense being used predicatively and being graded. I suggest moving |
It would vote on merging the definitions and examples. So we are not missing anything. |
Actually, that is a good point. We can have multiple definitions, so this would be fine here |
1-You did the opposite: you moved ewn-02057872-a into ewn-02801550-a |
Okay, I reverted this commit and will push it to the 2021 release |
(18) rural -- (living in or characteristic of farming or country life; "rural people"; "large rural households"; "unpaved rural roads"; "an economy that is basically rural")
(7) rural -- (of or relating to the countryside as opposed to the city; "rural electrification"; "rural free delivery")
Hard to make the difference... maybe the glosses could be edited?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: