Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rural adjective #238

Closed
arademaker opened this issue Dec 28, 2019 · 10 comments · Fixed by #403
Closed

rural adjective #238

arademaker opened this issue Dec 28, 2019 · 10 comments · Fixed by #403
Labels
synset duplicate A synset has been claimed as a duplicate
Milestone

Comments

@arademaker
Copy link
Member

  1. (18) rural -- (living in or characteristic of farming or country life; "rural people"; "large rural households"; "unpaved rural roads"; "an economy that is basically rural")

  2. (7) rural -- (of or relating to the countryside as opposed to the city; "rural electrification"; "rural free delivery")

Hard to make the difference... maybe the glosses could be edited?

@arademaker
Copy link
Member Author

Maybe different from #35, here we have one descriptive and the other relational.

@jmccrae
Copy link
Member

jmccrae commented Dec 28, 2019

This isn't related to #35 as neither of these adjectives are satellites.

I think these should be merged, they seem indistinguishable to me.

@arademaker
Copy link
Member Author

There are some linguistics tests to distinguish between descriptive and relational adjectives (almost all references from Christiane Fellbaum. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database):

[relational] adjective plays a role similar to that of a modifying noun and functions as a classifier.

[Relational adjectives] do not refer to a property of the nouns they modify and so do not relate to an attribute.

regarding the position:

In some cases a noun gives rise to two homonymous adjectives, one a relational adjective, the other descriptive. For example, the adjective in criminal law is not the same as that in criminal behavior, as reflected in the fact that only in the second case can the adjective be used predicatively (His behavior is criminal but not *The law is criminal).

Typically [relational adjectives] occur only in attributive position, as modifying nouns do.

Typically they are not gradable

And typically (but not always) they lack direct antonyms.

In https://www.ucl.ac.uk/internet-grammar/adjectiv/attribut.htm the attributive position is defined:

Adjectives in the first position - before the noun - are called ATTRIBUTIVE adjectives. Those in the second position - after the noun - are called PREDICATIVE adjectives. Notice that predicative adjectives do not occur immediately after the noun. Instead, they follow a verb.

The problem is that almost all tests uses typically! ;-) The adjective rural is a hard case in the glosses. Consider the gloss below that defines the descriptive sense, that is the sense that is used to talk about properties of nouns. In the examples, we are suppose to use the sense of this same synset, the descriptive one. But rural people is a property of the people? IMO, it is more a modifier of the word people.

(a) rural | living in or characteristic of farming or country life ; rural people ; large rural households ; unpaved rural roads ; an economy that is basically rural

Few more examples: rural students it is more relational; rural life is more descriptive (describing properties of life) and rural matters looks like both...

So I am not sure if they should be merged. But surely the glosses could be improved... Maybe a pattern for differentiate descriptive/relational would be nice.

@arademaker
Copy link
Member Author

In a more radical direction, at some point, we could think of changing the way adjectives are modeled: http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/GermaNet/adjectives.shtml

@arademaker
Copy link
Member Author

After consulting Christiane Fellbaum, I also agree to merge the two synsets.

@jmccrae jmccrae added the synset duplicate A synset has been claimed as a duplicate label Jan 2, 2020
@jmccrae jmccrae added this to the 2020 Release milestone Jan 2, 2020
@jmccrae
Copy link
Member

jmccrae commented Jan 2, 2020

I also don't think either of these senses are a relational sense of the adjective. It is easy to find corpus evidence of either sense being used predicatively and being graded.

I suggest moving ewn-02801550-a into ewn-02057872-a but keeping the former's definition "of or relating to the countryside as opposed to the city"

@arademaker
Copy link
Member Author

It would vote on merging the definitions and examples. So we are not missing anything.

@jmccrae
Copy link
Member

jmccrae commented Jan 2, 2020

Actually, that is a good point. We can have multiple definitions, so this would be fine here

@jmccrae jmccrae added the PR created A pull request has been made and this issue will be closed soon label Mar 21, 2020
jmccrae added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2020
@1313ou
Copy link
Contributor

1313ou commented Apr 6, 2020

I suggest moving ewn-02801550-a into ewn-02057872-a

1-You did the opposite: you moved ewn-02057872-a into ewn-02801550-a
see commit
2-In the process the antonymy relation to urban has gone down the drain. So it should be reopened.
3-The similar relation now crosses lexfile boundaries changing how the head is computed.
4-Why didn't 'urban' undergo the same merging process ?
5-The mystery of multiple definitions is solved.

@jmccrae jmccrae reopened this Apr 6, 2020
@jmccrae
Copy link
Member

jmccrae commented Apr 6, 2020

Okay, I reverted this commit and will push it to the 2021 release

@jmccrae jmccrae modified the milestones: 2020 Release, 2021 Release Apr 6, 2020
@jmccrae jmccrae removed the PR created A pull request has been made and this issue will be closed soon label Apr 6, 2020
Ciara97olo added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2021
Merged ewn-02801550-a into 02057872-a, merged definitions and examples also.
jmccrae added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
jmccrae added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 13, 2021
@jmccrae jmccrae closed this as completed Aug 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
synset duplicate A synset has been claimed as a duplicate
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants