Refactor for Deno compatibility and DevContainer setup #23
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a comprehensive update to the project’s containerized development, database abstraction, API endpoints, and front-end interactivity. New configuration files for Docker, devcontainer, and workspace settings have been added, and the Dockerfile is updated to use a new Node 20 base image with upgraded NPM and TypeScript. Database interactions are now funneled through a new module and API endpoints are refactored accordingly, including a new Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant B as Browser
participant V as VueLogin
participant S as Server
U->>B: Open login page
B->>V: Load Vue application
activate V
V->>B: Display form (email, password, qsp)
U->>V: Fill and submit credentials
V->>S: POST login request with data
S-->>V: Validate & respond with redirect (includes qsp)
V->>B: Redirect user accordingly
deactivate V
sequenceDiagram
participant U as User
participant B as Browser
participant VC as VueConsent
participant I as IdentityAPI
U->>B: Open OAuth consent page
B->>VC: Load Vue application and fetch accounts
U->>VC: Select accounts and click "Authorize"
VC->>I: Submit authorization request
I->>I: Generate HMAC hash & update sessionTokens
I->>B: Redirect with hashed token in query string
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/routes/accounts.ts (1)
287-309: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionDuplicate POST routes
You define twoPOST /:accountId/transactionsroutes. One will overshadow the other, or they may conflict. Ensure these paths differ if their functionality is unique, or consolidate them if they’re intended to do the same thing.
🧹 Nitpick comments (17)
src/db.ts (3)
1-3: PreferfindUniquefor unique primary keys
You’re using.findFirst()in several places (e.g.,getAccount,getBeneficiary) even though the IDs (accountId,beneficiaryId, etc.) are presumably unique. Using.findUnique()or.findUniqueOrThrow()is typically best practice for performance and clarity if the fields are indeed unique in the schema.
57-57: Introduce pagination or filtering for large result sets
Methods likegetTransactionsand mass-delete operations (e.g.,deleteAllTransactions) can handle large datasets. Implement pagination or filtering to improve scalability and reduce memory overhead.Also applies to: 80-80, 88-88
191-216: Potential caching for reference data
Methods likegetCountries,getCurrencies,getMerchants, andgetSettingsretrieve reference data that can be frequently accessed. Consider caching or memoizing these calls for performance benefits when the data rarely changes.src/routes/accounts.ts (4)
4-4: Remove or narrow down unused import
Importing{ Prisma }directly just forPrisma.Decimalor other minor usage may be excessive if it isn’t needed in the rest of the file. Consider removing it or importing only the required type to keep dependencies clean.Also applies to: 8-8
24-27: Repeated ID presence checks
Each route checks for a missingaccountIdand returns a 404 or 400. While this is valid, you could extract this logic into a small middleware to keep routes cleaner and avoid repetition.Also applies to: 66-68, 142-144, 205-207, 364-366
160-174: Clarify partial success vs. rollback
Withintransfermultiple, each iteration executes multiple DB writes. If any write fails mid-loop, you’ll have partial success. Consider using a transaction or clarifying if partial success is acceptable.
238-252: Avoid code repetition for transaction objects
Creating transactions often follows a similar pattern. A helper function or factory could reduce duplication and potential inconsistencies when constructing transaction objects.src/routes/cards.ts (2)
68-70: Centralize repeated “missing cardKey” checks
The code repeatedly checksif (!cardKey) return 404. This is correct but could be centralized into a reusable middleware, making the routes cleaner and easier to maintain.Also applies to: 109-111, 133-135, 153-155, 181-183, 208-210, 242-244, 275-277, 341-343, 406-408
302-316: Parallel vs. serial log creation
When creating execution logs in a for-loop, consider parallel insertion or a transaction-based approach to handle large sets of logs and maintain data integrity if any insertion fails.Also applies to: 368-382
src/types.ts (2)
55-66: LGTM! Well-structured Card interface.The
Cardinterface provides comprehensive type safety for card-related operations.Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose of each property:
+/** + * Represents a card entity with its associated properties. + */ export interface Card { + /** Unique identifier for the card */ cardKey: string, + /** Masked card number */ cardNumber: string, + /** Indicates if the card supports programmable features */ isProgrammable: boolean, + /** Current status of the card */ status: string, + /** Type code identifying the card category */ cardTypeCode: string, + /** Associated account identifier */ accountId: string, + /** Associated account number */ accountNumber: string, + /** Published code version */ publishedCode: string, + /** Saved code version */ savedCode: string, + /** Environment variables associated with the card */ envs: string }
68-74: LGTM! Well-defined SettingType enum.The
SettingTypeenum effectively standardizes setting keys.Consider adding JSDoc comments to document the purpose of the enum:
+/** + * Enumeration of available setting types for configuration. + */ export enum SettingType { + /** Client identifier for authentication */ CLIENT_ID = 'client_id', + /** Client secret for authentication */ CLIENT_SECRET = 'client_secret', + /** API key for service access */ API_KEY = 'api_key', + /** Token expiration duration */ TOKEN_EXPIRY = 'token_expiry', + /** Authentication status */ AUTH = 'auth', }src/app.ts (1)
145-145: Simplify boolean conversion.The ternary operator is unnecessary for boolean conversion.
- await updateSetting(SettingType.AUTH, (req.body.auth)? true:false) + await updateSetting(SettingType.AUTH, Boolean(req.body.auth))🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 145-145: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
.devcontainer/Dockerfile (1)
20-25: Optimize Package Installation CommandsWhile the current commands correctly update the package lists and install prerequisites, consider combining these steps into a single
RUNcommand and cleaning the apt cache. This reduces the number of image layers and the final image size. For example:-RUN apt-get update -RUN apt-get install -y \ - lsb-release \ - curl +RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y lsb-release curl && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*This refactor is optional but can improve build efficiency.
.devcontainer/docker-compose.yml (1)
40-41: Ensure a Newline at the End of FileYAML best practices recommend ending the file with a newline character. Please add a newline at the end to avoid potential linting issues.
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 41-41: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
package.json (1)
7-11: Review NPM Development ScriptsThe updated scripts for
start,dev,dev:tsc, anddev:nodeare clearly defined. Note that using the&operator to run commands concurrently works well on Unix-like systems; however, consider using a cross-platform solution likeconcurrentlyif Windows support is desired.src/login.html (1)
26-26: Dynamic Form Action Binding
The form tag now uses a dynamic binding for the action attribute (:action="loginUrl"), which is appropriate for the Vue-driven login flow. However, if you intend to reference the form in your methods (e.g. viathis.$refs.form), you should add a correspondingref="form"attribute on this<form>element.README.md (1)
30-34: Clear DevContainer Setup Instructions
The new "DevContainer (VSCode)" section is a clear and useful addition to document the containerized development environment. The instructions, including the Docker Compose command, provide good guidance. You might consider adding a note about prerequisites (e.g. having Docker and Docker Compose installed) for enhanced clarity.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonprisma/dev.dbis excluded by!**/*.db
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
.devcontainer/.dockerignore(1 hunks).devcontainer/Dockerfile(1 hunks).devcontainer/devcontainer.json(1 hunks).devcontainer/docker-compose.yml(1 hunks).devcontainer/init.sh(1 hunks).eslintrc(0 hunks).github/workflows/programmablebanking-AutoDeployTrigger-b8b99f1a-47cf-45a3-8581-520a0a87e69d.yml(0 hunks).github/workflows/programmablebanking-team1-AutoDeployTrigger-23e2c662-2901-496b-8e70-b70cadcb7773.yml(0 hunks).mocharc.json(0 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)eslint.config.js(0 hunks)jest.config.ts(0 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)prisma/seed.ts(1 hunks)programmable-banking-sim.code-workspace(1 hunks)src/app.ts(7 hunks)src/db.ts(1 hunks)src/login.html(2 hunks)src/oauth-consent.html(1 hunks)src/routes/accounts.ts(14 hunks)src/routes/cards.ts(25 hunks)src/routes/identity.ts(2 hunks)src/types.ts(1 hunks)test/account.spec.ts(1 hunks)test/beneficiary.spec.ts(1 hunks)test/card.spec.ts(1 hunks)test/environmentalvariables.spec.ts(1 hunks)tsconfig.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (6)
- .eslintrc
- .github/workflows/programmablebanking-team1-AutoDeployTrigger-23e2c662-2901-496b-8e70-b70cadcb7773.yml
- jest.config.ts
- .github/workflows/programmablebanking-AutoDeployTrigger-b8b99f1a-47cf-45a3-8581-520a0a87e69d.yml
- .mocharc.json
- eslint.config.js
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .devcontainer/.dockerignore
- programmable-banking-sim.code-workspace
- prisma/seed.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Shellcheck (0.10.0)
.devcontainer/init.sh
[error] 1-1: Tips depend on target shell and yours is unknown. Add a shebang or a 'shell' directive.
(SC2148)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.devcontainer/docker-compose.yml
[error] 41-41: no new line character at the end of file
(new-line-at-end-of-file)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/routes/identity.ts
[error] 123-123: This code is unreachable
... because this statement will return from the function beforehand
(lint/correctness/noUnreachable)
src/app.ts
[error] 145-145: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with
(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
🔇 Additional comments (17)
src/db.ts (1)
163-189: Consider concurrency implications
Multiple concurrent calls tocreateExecutionorcreateExecutionLogcan race if there are shared resources or constraints. Ensure that table constraints or logic handle concurrent inserts safely without data corruption. A transaction-based approach or additional locking (if needed) can help mitigate race conditions.src/routes/accounts.ts (1)
12-12: Straightforward retrieval
The call togetAccounts()is clear and matches the code’s objective.src/routes/cards.ts (2)
6-7: Correct typed import usage
The import forExecutionItemandCardis spot on and helps maintain type safety.
122-122: Risk of storing untrusted code
You’re storing user-provided code strings in the database. This can pose a security risk if it’s ever executed or rendered without sanitization. Make sure to sanitize or validate code input to mitigate potential exploits.
[security]Also applies to: 142-142
test/beneficiary.spec.ts (1)
2-3:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
LGTM! Import changes align with Deno compatibility.
The changes correctly:
- Add
.jsextension for Deno compatibility- Transition from Chai to Vitest for assertions
Run the following script to verify consistent usage of
.jsextensions and Vitest across test files:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistent usage of .js extensions and Vitest across test files # Test: Search for imports without .js extension echo "Checking for imports without .js extension in test files..." rg "from '\.\./src/[^']*'(?<!\.js')" "test/*.ts" # Test: Search for remaining Chai imports echo "Checking for remaining Chai imports..." rg "from 'chai'" "test/*.ts"Length of output: 622
Subject: Verify Deno Compatibility Imports in Test Files
The updated import changes look good at a glance, ensuring that
.jsextensions are applied for Deno compatibility and that Vitest has replaced Chai. However, the original automated verification script failed due to unsupported look-around usage. Please re-run verification with a corrected script (using the--pcre2flag) to confirm that:
- All imports from
../src/in test files include the.jsextension.- There are no remaining Chai imports in the test files.
For example, you can try the following revised shell script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify usage of .js extensions and removal of Chai imports in test files echo "Checking for imports missing the .js extension in test files..." rg --pcre2 "from '../src/[^']*(?<!\.js)'" test/ echo "Checking for remaining Chai imports in test files..." rg "from 'chai'" test/Once confirmed manually with these updated checks, we can be confident in merging these changes.
test/environmentalvariables.spec.ts (1)
2-3: LGTM! Import changes maintain consistency.The changes maintain consistency with other test files by:
- Adding
.jsextension for Deno compatibility- Transitioning from Chai to Vitest for assertions
test/account.spec.ts (1)
2-3: LGTM! Import changes maintain consistency.The changes maintain consistency with other test files by:
- Adding
.jsextension for Deno compatibility- Transitioning from Chai to Vitest for assertions
test/card.spec.ts (1)
2-3: LGTM! Framework migration looks good.The changes to use Vitest and explicit
.jsextension improve compatibility with Deno and modern testing practices.tsconfig.json (1)
3-20: LGTM! TypeScript configuration improvements.The changes enhance type safety and module compatibility:
- ESM compatibility through
moduleResolutionandmodulesettings- Strict type checking with
noUncheckedIndexedAccess- Modern features enabled with
es2022target and lib.devcontainer/init.sh (1)
10-11: Verify Git Configuration CommandsThe Git configuration commands using
runuserare correctly set to execute under thenodeuser. Confirm that the target directory (/work) and appropriate permissions exist in your container environment..devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1)
1-31: DevContainer JSON Configuration Looks GoodThe configuration properly references the Docker Compose file, assigns the correct service, sets the workspace folder, and includes useful Visual Studio Code customizations. Everything aligns with the intended setup.
.devcontainer/Dockerfile (1)
1-32: Dockerfile Base Image and Tooling UpdateThe update to use
node:20.12.2as the base image, alongside the explicit NPM and TypeScript version installations, is well documented. These changes support the new development requirements effectively..devcontainer/docker-compose.yml (1)
1-39: Docker Compose Configuration Is SolidThe service configuration for
typescript-dev—including port mappings, volume mounts, and the startup command to run the initialization script—is clearly documented and aligns with the containerized development goals.package.json (2)
13-16: Enhanced Build ProcessThe added scripts for cleaning, copying files, and rebuilding (using
rimrafandcopyfiles) contribute to a robust and maintainable build process. These changes are well integrated.
40-53: Dependency Versions and Tooling UpdateUpgrading dependencies such as
@types/node,typescript, and introducingvitestreflects the project's shift towards a more modern development workflow. Please verify that these updates are compatible with the rest of your codebase and do not introduce any breaking changes.src/login.html (2)
30-33: Enhanced Input Bindings for Email and Hidden Field
The email input now correctly usesv-model="email", and the new hidden input bindsqspdynamically. This ensures the form will automatically update these values.
39-39: Password Input with Two-Way Binding
The password input now usesv-model="password", which is ideal for real‑time data binding in Vue.
| return prisma.account.findMany() | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| export async function createAccount(account: any) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Eliminate any usage for creation methods
Currently, createAccount, createBeneficiary, and createTransaction accept parameters typed as any. This approach can mask type mismatches and runtime errors. Define dedicated types or interfaces that match your Prisma schema for better type safety and maintainability.
Also applies to: 47-47, 65-65
| const accountId = req.params.account | ||
| if (!accountId) { | ||
| return formatErrorResponse(req, res, 404) // no account was found |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Possible route param mismatch
The code reads req.params.account even though the route defines :accountId. This likely leads to undefined behavior.
- const accountId = req.params.account
+ const accountId = req.params.accountId📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const accountId = req.params.account | |
| if (!accountId) { | |
| return formatErrorResponse(req, res, 404) // no account was found | |
| const accountId = req.params.accountId | |
| if (!accountId) { | |
| return formatErrorResponse(req, res, 404) // no account was found |
src/routes/identity.ts
Outdated
| const secret = 'abcdefg'; | ||
| const hash = createHmac('sha256', secret) | ||
| .update('I love cupcakes') | ||
| .digest('hex'); | ||
| // const responseType = req.query.response_type | ||
| authorizationCodes[authorizationCode.code] = authorizationCode | ||
|
|
||
| // return res.json({ Location: "localhost:3000/login?qsp=" + uuid}).redirect(302, 'localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + uuid) | ||
| return res.redirect( | ||
| 302, | ||
| authorizationCode.redirect_uri + | ||
| '?authorizationCode=' + | ||
| authorizationCode.code + | ||
| '&status=SUCCESS&code=' + | ||
| authorizationCode.code, | ||
| ) | ||
| sessionTokens[hash] = authorizationCode | ||
| return res.redirect(302, 'localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + hash) | ||
| return res.json({ Location: "localhost:3000/login?qsp=" + hash}).redirect(302, 'localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + hash) | ||
| // return res.redirect( | ||
| // 302, | ||
| // authorizationCode.redirect_uri + | ||
| // '?authorizationCode=' + | ||
| // authorizationCode.code + | ||
| // '&status=SUCCESS&code=' + | ||
| // authorizationCode.code, | ||
| // ) | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Security: Remove hardcoded secret and improve hash generation.
Current implementation has several security concerns:
- Hardcoded secret for HMAC
- Static string for hash generation
- Hardcoded localhost URL
Consider these improvements:
- Move the secret to environment variables
- Use a secure random value for hash generation
- Make the redirect URL configurable
+import { randomBytes } from 'crypto'
+
+const SECRET = process.env.HMAC_SECRET
+if (!SECRET) {
+ throw new Error('HMAC_SECRET environment variable is required')
+}
+
+const REDIRECT_URL = process.env.REDIRECT_URL || 'http://localhost:3000'
+
- const secret = 'abcdefg';
- const hash = createHmac('sha256', secret)
- .update('I love cupcakes')
+ const randomValue = randomBytes(32).toString('hex')
+ const hash = createHmac('sha256', SECRET)
+ .update(randomValue)
.digest('hex');
authorizationCodes[authorizationCode.code] = authorizationCode
sessionTokens[hash] = authorizationCode
- return res.redirect(302, 'localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + hash)
+ return res.redirect(302, `${REDIRECT_URL}/login?qsp=${hash}`)
- return res.json({ Location: "localhost:3000/login?qsp=" + hash}).redirect(302, 'localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + hash)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const secret = 'abcdefg'; | |
| const hash = createHmac('sha256', secret) | |
| .update('I love cupcakes') | |
| .digest('hex'); | |
| // const responseType = req.query.response_type | |
| authorizationCodes[authorizationCode.code] = authorizationCode | |
| // return res.json({ Location: "localhost:3000/login?qsp=" + uuid}).redirect(302, 'localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + uuid) | |
| return res.redirect( | |
| 302, | |
| authorizationCode.redirect_uri + | |
| '?authorizationCode=' + | |
| authorizationCode.code + | |
| '&status=SUCCESS&code=' + | |
| authorizationCode.code, | |
| ) | |
| sessionTokens[hash] = authorizationCode | |
| return res.redirect(302, 'localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + hash) | |
| return res.json({ Location: "localhost:3000/login?qsp=" + hash}).redirect(302, 'localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + hash) | |
| // return res.redirect( | |
| // 302, | |
| // authorizationCode.redirect_uri + | |
| // '?authorizationCode=' + | |
| // authorizationCode.code + | |
| // '&status=SUCCESS&code=' + | |
| // authorizationCode.code, | |
| // ) | |
| }) | |
| import { randomBytes } from 'crypto' | |
| const SECRET = process.env.HMAC_SECRET | |
| if (!SECRET) { | |
| throw new Error('HMAC_SECRET environment variable is required') | |
| } | |
| const REDIRECT_URL = process.env.REDIRECT_URL || 'http://localhost:3000' | |
| const randomValue = randomBytes(32).toString('hex') | |
| const hash = createHmac('sha256', SECRET) | |
| .update(randomValue) | |
| .digest('hex'); | |
| // const responseType = req.query.response_type | |
| authorizationCodes[authorizationCode.code] = authorizationCode | |
| sessionTokens[hash] = authorizationCode | |
| return res.redirect(302, `${REDIRECT_URL}/login?qsp=${hash}`) | |
| }) |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 123-123: This code is unreachable
... because this statement will return from the function beforehand
(lint/correctness/noUnreachable)
| }, | ||
| data() { | ||
| return { | ||
| email: '[email protected]', | ||
| password: 'admin', | ||
| qsp: ref(), | ||
| loginUrl: ref() | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Data Properties Initialization – Missing Reactive Alert Message
In the Vue app’s data() block, properties for email, password, qsp, and loginUrl are correctly declared. However, the toast() and clearToast() methods later reference an alertMessage property that is not initialized. Consider adding an initialization for alertMessage (e.g., alertMessage: null) to avoid runtime issues.
Suggested diff to add the missing property:
return {
- email: '[email protected]',
- password: 'admin',
- qsp: ref(),
- loginUrl: ref()
+ email: '[email protected]',
+ password: 'admin',
+ qsp: ref(),
+ loginUrl: ref(),
+ alertMessage: null,
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| data() { | |
| return { | |
| email: '[email protected]', | |
| password: 'admin', | |
| qsp: ref(), | |
| loginUrl: ref() | |
| } | |
| }, | |
| data() { | |
| return { | |
| email: '[email protected]', | |
| password: 'admin', | |
| qsp: ref(), | |
| loginUrl: ref(), | |
| alertMessage: null, | |
| } | |
| }, |
| methods: { | ||
| mySubmitMethod() { | ||
| if (this.email && this.password) { | ||
| this.$refs.form. | ||
| this.$refs.form.submit() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Incomplete Form Reference in Submission Method
Within the mySubmitMethod() function, line 75 contains an incomplete expression (this.$refs.form.) before calling this.$refs.form.submit(). Moreover, the <form> tag lacks a ref attribute. Either remove the incomplete statement or properly set up a form ref.
Suggested diff to remove the incomplete code:
- this.$refs.form.
this.$refs.form.submit()📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| mySubmitMethod() { | |
| if (this.email && this.password) { | |
| this.$refs.form. | |
| this.$refs.form.submit() | |
| } | |
| mySubmitMethod() { | |
| if (this.email && this.password) { | |
| this.$refs.form.submit() | |
| } |
| </div> | ||
| <div class="mt-10 sm:mx-auto sm:w-full sm:max-w-sm"> | ||
| <form class="space-y-6" action="/oauth" method="POST"> | ||
| <form class="space-y-6" action="#" @submit.prevent="" method="POST"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Unassigned Submit Handler on Form Element
The <form> tag includes an empty @submit.prevent="" attribute. If the form submission is fully handled by the buttons’ @click events, consider removing this empty directive for clarity. Alternatively, if you meant to attach a handler (or tie it to one of the methods), update the directive accordingly.
Introduces /identity/approve and /identity/decline endpoints to handle user consent decisions in the OAuth flow. Updates the consent HTML to redirect to these endpoints with selected accounts. Also improves security by using a configurable secret for HMAC generation and includes additional context in the hash.
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| const hash = createHmac('sha256', secret) | ||
| .update(dataToHash) | ||
| .digest('hex'); | ||
| // const responseType = req.query.response_type | ||
| if (settings.auth === false) { |
Check warning
Code scanning / CodeQL
Server-side URL redirect Medium
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/oauth-consent.html (2)
34-34: Empty submit handler remains unresolved.The form still has an empty
@submit.prevent=""directive without any handler logic. Since form submission is handled entirely by the button click events, this directive should be removed for clarity.-<form class="space-y-6" action="#" @submit.prevent="" method="POST"> +<form class="space-y-6" action="#" method="POST">
101-107: Toast methods still reference undefined property.The
toastandclearToastmethods usethis.alertMessagewhich isn't declared in the component's data. This will cause runtime errors.data() { return { socket: null, messages: null, accounts: ref([]), selectedAccounts: ref([]), qsp: ref(), + alertMessage: null, } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/oauth-consent.html(1 hunks)src/routes/identity.ts(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/routes/identity.ts (2)
src/app.ts (4)
formatErrorResponse(246-261)authorizationCodes(46-46)settings(35-35)sessionTokens(48-48)src/types.ts (1)
AuthorizationCode(11-16)
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
src/routes/identity.ts
[warning] 119-123: Server-side URL redirect
Untrusted URL redirection depends on a user-provided value.
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/oauth-consent.html (3)
39-46: Dynamic account rendering implementation looks good.The Vue.js integration for dynamic account rendering is well-implemented with proper v-for iteration, v-model binding for checkbox selection, and dynamic attribute binding for accessibility.
51-52: Button event handlers are correctly implemented.The submit buttons properly use Vue's
@clickevent handlers with clear action differentiation between 'decline' and 'submit'.
90-99: Submit method implementation has logic issues.The submit method has a placeholder alert call that references an undefined
$alertmethod. This should be replaced with the existingtoastmethod for consistency.async submit(action) { if (action === "submit"){ - // Include selected accounts in the approval const selectedAccountsParam = this.selectedAccounts.length > 0 ? '&selectedAccounts=' + encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(this.selectedAccounts)) : ''; window.location.href = '/identity/approve?qsp=' + this.qsp + selectedAccountsParam; return; } else { window.location.href = '/identity/decline?qsp=' + this.qsp; } },Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
src/routes/identity.ts (6)
21-21: Improved authorization header parsing.The enhanced parsing with proper fallback handling for missing authorization headers is a good improvement that prevents potential runtime errors.
55-55: Debug logging addition is helpful.Adding
console.table(authorizationCodes)provides useful debugging information for the authorization flow.
116-122: Significant security improvement in hash generation.The new implementation addresses previous security concerns by:
- Using environment variable for secret (with fallback)
- Creating dynamic hash input with timestamp and authorization details
- Proper HMAC-SHA256 implementation
This is a substantial improvement over the previous hardcoded approach.
123-136: OAuth flow logic is well-structured.The conditional logic properly handles both authenticated and non-authenticated flows, with appropriate redirects for each case.
138-156: Approve endpoint implementation is secure and well-structured.The
/approveendpoint properly:
- Validates the session token
- Cleans up the session after use
- Redirects with appropriate success parameters
The implementation follows OAuth2 best practices.
158-173: Decline endpoint needs URL validation.The decline endpoint properly handles session validation and cleanup, but the redirect URL concatenation could be vulnerable to open redirect attacks as flagged by static analysis.
The static analysis correctly identifies a potential open redirect vulnerability. The
redirect_uricomes from user input and should be validated against a whitelist.+// Add at the top of the file +const ALLOWED_REDIRECT_HOSTS = process.env.ALLOWED_REDIRECT_HOSTS?.split(',') || ['localhost:3000']; + +function validateRedirectUri(uri: string): boolean { + try { + const url = new URL('http://' + uri); + return ALLOWED_REDIRECT_HOSTS.includes(url.host); + } catch { + return false; + } +} router.get('/decline', (req: Request, res: Response) => { const qsp = req.query.qsp as string if (!qsp || !sessionTokens[qsp]) { return formatErrorResponse(req, res, 400) } const authorizationCode: AuthorizationCode = sessionTokens[qsp] + + if (!validateRedirectUri(authorizationCode.redirect_uri)) { + return formatErrorResponse(req, res, 400) + } + delete sessionTokens[qsp]This same validation should be applied to the
/approveendpoint as well.
| fetchAccounts() { | ||
| fetch('/za/pb/v1/accounts') | ||
| .then(response => response.json()) | ||
| .then(data => { | ||
| this.accounts = data.data.accounts; | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for API calls.
The fetchAccounts method lacks error handling for failed API requests, which could lead to unhandled promise rejections.
fetchAccounts() {
fetch('/za/pb/v1/accounts')
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
this.accounts = data.data.accounts;
- });
+ })
+ .catch(error => {
+ console.error('Failed to fetch accounts:', error);
+ this.toast('Failed to load accounts. Please try again.');
+ });
},📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| fetchAccounts() { | |
| fetch('/za/pb/v1/accounts') | |
| .then(response => response.json()) | |
| .then(data => { | |
| this.accounts = data.data.accounts; | |
| }); | |
| fetchAccounts() { | |
| fetch('/za/pb/v1/accounts') | |
| .then(response => response.json()) | |
| .then(data => { | |
| this.accounts = data.data.accounts; | |
| }) | |
| .catch(error => { | |
| console.error('Failed to fetch accounts:', error); | |
| this.toast('Failed to load accounts. Please try again.'); | |
| }); | |
| }, |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/oauth-consent.html around lines 83 to 88, the fetchAccounts method does
not handle errors from the fetch API call, risking unhandled promise rejections.
Add a .catch block after the .then chains to catch any errors during the fetch
or JSON parsing, and handle them appropriately, such as logging the error or
updating the UI to indicate the failure.
| } | ||
| authorizationCodes[authorizationCode.code] = authorizationCode | ||
| sessionTokens[hash] = authorizationCode | ||
| return res.redirect(302, 'http://localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + hash) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Hardcoded localhost URL should be configurable.
The redirect URL is still hardcoded to localhost, which limits deployment flexibility and was mentioned in previous reviews.
-return res.redirect(302, 'http://localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + hash)
+const baseUrl = process.env.BASE_URL || 'http://localhost:3000';
+return res.redirect(302, `${baseUrl}/login?qsp=${hash}`)Let me verify if BASE_URL is used elsewhere in the codebase:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if BASE_URL environment variable is used elsewhere
# Expected: Find any existing BASE_URL usage patterns
rg -i "base_url|baseurl" --type ts --type jsLength of output: 46
Let's check how environment variables and config are handled elsewhere to ensure adding BASE_URL fits the existing patterns:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for existing environment variable usage and config files
echo "=== process.env usage ==="
rg -n "process\\.env" --type ts --type js || true
echo "=== dotenv usage ==="
rg -n "dotenv" --type ts --type js || true
echo "=== .env files ==="
ls -1 . | grep -E "^\\.env" || true
echo "=== env/config files ==="
fd --type f -e ts -e js -g "*env*.ts" -g "*config*.ts" || trueLength of output: 875
Parameterize Hardcoded Redirect URL
The redirect in src/routes/identity.ts is still hardcoded to http://localhost:3000. To make this configurable and align with how other env vars are handled, please:
• Update the redirect call at line 135:
- return res.redirect(302, 'http://localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + hash)
+ const baseUrl = process.env.BASE_URL || 'http://localhost:3000'
+ return res.redirect(302, `${baseUrl}/login?qsp=${hash}`)• Add a BASE_URL entry to your environment examples (e.g. .env.example and README):
BASE_URL=http://localhost:3000
• Ensure dotenv.config() in src/app.ts still runs before this route is mounted so process.env.BASE_URL is populated.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| return res.redirect(302, 'http://localhost:3000/login?qsp=' + hash) | |
| const baseUrl = process.env.BASE_URL || 'http://localhost:3000' | |
| return res.redirect(302, `${baseUrl}/login?qsp=${hash}`) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/routes/identity.ts at line 135, replace the hardcoded redirect URL
'http://localhost:3000' with a parameterized value using process.env.BASE_URL to
make it configurable. Additionally, add a BASE_URL entry to the environment
example files like .env.example and update the README to document this variable.
Verify that dotenv.config() is called in src/app.ts before this route is used to
ensure process.env.BASE_URL is properly loaded.
Refactor the codebase to support Deno, implement DevContainer testing, and update the README with DevContainer details.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Documentation
Chores