Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement update for remove-snapshots action #1561

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

grihabor
Copy link

No description provided.

@grihabor grihabor changed the title Implement update for remove-snapshot action Implement update for remove-snapshots action Jan 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjqliu kevinjqliu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! This was one of the missing update functions mentioned in #952

Do you mind also including some tests? Similar to

def test_apply_remove_properties_update(table_v2: Table) -> None:
base_metadata = update_table_metadata(
table_v2.metadata,
(SetPropertiesUpdate(updates={"test_a": "test_a", "test_b": "test_b", "test_c": "test_c", "test_d": "test_d"}),),
)
new_metadata_no_removal = update_table_metadata(base_metadata, (RemovePropertiesUpdate(removals=[]),))
assert base_metadata == new_metadata_no_removal
new_metadata = update_table_metadata(base_metadata, (RemovePropertiesUpdate(removals=["test_a", "test_c"]),))
assert base_metadata.properties == {
"read.split.target.size": "134217728",
"test_a": "test_a",
"test_b": "test_b",
"test_c": "test_c",
"test_d": "test_d",
}
assert new_metadata.properties == {"read.split.target.size": "134217728", "test_b": "test_b", "test_d": "test_d"}

@grihabor
Copy link
Author

Sure! Thanks for the fast review

Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjqliu kevinjqliu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

left some comments, looks like theres also a linter error, do you mind running make lint locally?

snapshot_ids=[3051729675574597004],
)
new_metadata = update_table_metadata(table_v2.metadata, (update,))
assert len(new_metadata.snapshots) == 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if theres 1 snapshot, isnt that the current snapshot. if so, wouldnt it error?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is what's left after the removal, originally fixture has 2 snapshots

@@ -455,6 +455,19 @@ def _(update: SetSnapshotRefUpdate, base_metadata: TableMetadata, context: _Tabl
return base_metadata.model_copy(update=metadata_updates)


@_apply_table_update.register(RemoveSnapshotsUpdate)
def _(update: RemoveSnapshotsUpdate, base_metadata: TableMetadata, context: _TableMetadataUpdateContext) -> TableMetadata:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

def _(update: RemoveSnapshotsUpdate, base_metadata: TableMetadata, context: _TableMetadataUpdateContext) -> TableMetadata:
for remove_snapshot_id in update.snapshot_ids:
if remove_snapshot_id == base_metadata.current_snapshot_id:
raise ValueError(f"Can't remove current snapshot id {remove_snapshot_id}")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should we block the current snapshot?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not an expert in iceberg spec, but it's not clear what should happen if you try to remove the current snapshot.

I'm also not sure if I should update parent_snapshot_id in every snapshot that was referencing removed snapshots

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Decided to set parent_snapshot_id to None if the parent is gone

@grihabor
Copy link
Author

Hey @kevinjqliu, ready for another review round. I had to cherry pick the changes from #822 to reuse the code that removes refs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants