Skip to content

Conversation

@al3xa23
Copy link
Contributor

@al3xa23 al3xa23 commented Jan 16, 2025

Created a new smu branch because commit history was pretty messed up. Everything now is based on the status of the the old branch, but all smu changes included in one commit. Hope it is fine like that

Signed-off-by: Manuel Pitz <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexandra <[email protected]>
@al3xa23 al3xa23 requested a review from windrad6 January 16, 2025 14:26
@al3xa23 al3xa23 requested a review from stv0g as a code owner January 16, 2025 14:26
@al3xa23 al3xa23 closed this Jan 16, 2025
@al3xa23 al3xa23 reopened this Jan 16, 2025
@stv0g stv0g changed the title feat: smu node-type SMU node-type Jan 23, 2025
@stv0g stv0g added node enhancement New feature or request labels Jan 23, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@stv0g stv0g left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I started to review this PR, but before I continue, I would like to ask you to:

@stv0g
Copy link
Contributor

stv0g commented Feb 10, 2025

Hi @al3xa23,

I've met Cesar on our last SEGuRo project meeting and we talked about the SMU code.

He mentioned that he still wants to get this merged into VILLASnode.
I am now a bit surprised that the MR has been closed.

@windrad6 Maybe, you know more about the next steps here?

Let me know if there is something I can do to unblock this.

@al3xa23 al3xa23 reopened this Apr 24, 2025
@al3xa23 al3xa23 requested a review from n-eiling as a code owner April 24, 2025 08:49
@al3xa23 al3xa23 marked this pull request as draft April 24, 2025 08:49
@stv0g stv0g changed the title SMU node-type Add SMU node-type Apr 24, 2025
@al3xa23 al3xa23 marked this pull request as ready for review April 25, 2025 07:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request node

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants