Bump node, bump tinybench, and add support of walltime runs for tinybench

[GuillaumeLagrange]

• Node is bumped to 20.5.1 because of "type": "module" causes SyntaxError: Cannot use import statement outside a module in node >= 20.6.0 egoist/esbuild-register#96
  • In Node 22+, rollup had issues with the assert/with keyword https://github.com/rollup/rollup/
    issues/5685#issuecomment-2379581091
  • I could not find a workaround yet and this will be its own dedicated PR, I went with the best effort to bump node a tiny bit
• Bumped pnpm to v10, removed node16 tests since pnpm v10 requires at least node 18
• Tinybench was bumped to v4, which dropped cjs support
  • We will little by little follow their example and step into the future
• Thanks to @Nerivec for the heads up on the form-data vulnerability 🤗

Fix #44

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Instrumentation Performance Report

Merging #48 will degrade performances by 96.36%

_{Comparing cod-1066-tinybench-nodejs-support-for-the-walltime-executor (bfb95e2) with main (6df11e8)}

Summary

⚡ 10 improvements
❌ 22 (👁 22) regressions
✅ 50 untouched benchmarks
🆕 3 new benchmarks
⁉️ 4 (👁 4) dropped benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Change
👁	RegExp#test	14 µs	N/A	N/A
👁	String#indexOf	10.3 µs	N/A	N/A
👁	switch 1	11.9 µs	N/A	N/A
👁	switch 2	12.3 µs	N/A	N/A
👁	switch 1	11.9 µs	23.6 µs	-49.62%
👁	switch 2	12.4 µs	24.5 µs	-49.56%
👁	test_iterative_fibo_10	16.5 µs	453.2 µs	-96.36%
👁	test_iterative_fibo_100	24.8 µs	202.5 µs	-87.74%
👁	test_recursive_cached_fibo_10	30.6 µs	45.7 µs	-33.21%
👁	test_recursive_cached_fibo_20	35.7 µs	43.1 µs	-17.36%
👁	test_recursive_cached_fibo_30	41.7 µs	216.6 µs	-80.75%
👁	test sync baz 10	16.1 µs	209.6 µs	-92.31%
👁	test sync baz 100	17.7 µs	30.4 µs	-41.86%
⚡	test_recursive_fibo_10	34.6 µs	21.7 µs	+59.59%
👁	test_iterative_fibo_10	16.5 µs	28.5 µs	-42.15%
👁	test_iterative_fibo_100	24.7 µs	465.2 µs	-94.68%
👁	test_recursive_cached_fibo_10	30.6 µs	45.2 µs	-32.21%
👁	test_recursive_cached_fibo_20	35.6 µs	43 µs	-17.18%
👁	test_recursive_cached_fibo_30	41.8 µs	46.7 µs	-10.43%
👁	test sync baz 10	17 µs	38.3 µs	-55.66%
...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed WallTime Performance Report

Congrats! CodSpeed is installed 🎉

🆕 27 new benchmarks were detected.

You will start to see performance impacts in the reports once the benchmarks are run from your default branch.

Detected benchmarks

• switch 1 (156 ns)
• switch 2 (156 ns)
• test_iterative_fibo_10 (228 ns)
• test_iterative_fibo_100 (504 ns)
• test_recursive_cached_fibo_10 (984 ns)
• test_recursive_cached_fibo_20 (2.4 µs)
• test_recursive_cached_fibo_30 (3.1 µs)
• test_recursive_fibo_10 (2.1 µs)
• test_recursive_fibo_20 (248.3 µs)
• test sync baz 10 (168 ns)
• test sync baz 100 (276 ns)
• test_iterative_fibo_10 (216 ns)
• test_iterative_fibo_100 (504 ns)
• test_recursive_cached_fibo_10 (996 ns)
• test_recursive_cached_fibo_20 (2.3 µs)
• test_recursive_cached_fibo_30 (3.1 µs)
• test_recursive_fibo_10 (2.1 µs)
• test_recursive_fibo_20 (248.1 µs)
• test sync baz 10 (168 ns)
• test sync baz 100 (288 ns)
• switch 1 (156 ns)
• switch 2 (156 ns)
• switch 1 (144 ns)
• switch 2 (144 ns)
• wait 1ms (1 ms)
• wait 1sec (1 s)
• wait 500ms (500 ms)

[adriencaccia]

Nice!
Really eager to release this

[Nerivec]

My two cents on the node issues: since you're at it, might be best to move away from esbuild-register, seems it's not maintained anymore? https://github.com/egoist/esbuild-register/commits/dev/

[GuillaumeLagrange]

My two cents on the node issues: since you're at it, might be best to move away from esbuild-register, seems it's not maintained anymore? https://github.com/egoist/esbuild-register/commits/dev/

That's the plan, but I ran into issues making tsx work under our valgrind instrumentation for now, and do not have time to deep dive yet.
Definitely the long term fix is to migrate towards tsx or another modern equivalent of esbuild-register. Who knows, we might even be able to use node's native solution someday 👼