ui: Distinguish bot users in more places #764
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ void main() { | |
| // TODO(#232): syntax like `check(find(…), findsOneWidget)` | ||
| final widget = tester.widget(find.descendant( | ||
| of: find.byType(RecentDmConversationsItem), | ||
| matching: find.byWidgetPredicate((widget) => widget is Text | ||
| && (widget.textSpan?.toPlainText(includePlaceholders: false) ?? '') == expectedText), | ||
|
Comment on lines
-142
to
+143
There was a problem hiding this comment. I'm getting some test failures at this commit, but they go away in the next commit. I think it's fine to squash the test change in with the change that fixes the failures. It's not uncommon (though can be helpful to avoid when possible) that a test ends up depending on some implementation detail, and needs to be updated when that detail changes. |
||
| )); | ||
| if (expectedLines != null) { | ||
| final renderObject = tester.renderObject<RenderParagraph>(find.byWidget(widget)); | ||
|
|
@@ -149,6 +150,14 @@ void main() { | |
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| void checkBotIcon({required int count}) { | ||
| final botFinder = find.descendant( | ||
| of: find.byType(RecentDmConversationsItem), | ||
| matching: find.byIcon(ZulipIcons.bot)).hitTestable(); | ||
|
|
||
| check(botFinder.evaluate().length).equals(count); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| Future<void> markMessageAsRead(WidgetTester tester, Message message) async { | ||
| final store = await testBinding.globalStore.perAccount(eg.selfAccount.id); | ||
| await store.handleEvent(UpdateMessageFlagsAddEvent( | ||
|
|
@@ -176,6 +185,7 @@ void main() { | |
|
|
||
| checkAvatar(tester, DmNarrow.ofMessage(message, selfUserId: eg.selfUser.userId)); | ||
| checkTitle(tester, eg.selfUser.fullName); | ||
| checkBotIcon(count: 0); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('short name takes one line', (WidgetTester tester) async { | ||
|
|
@@ -184,6 +194,7 @@ void main() { | |
| await setupPage(tester, users: [], dmMessages: [message], | ||
| newNameForSelfUser: name); | ||
| checkTitle(tester, name, 1); | ||
| checkBotIcon(count: 0); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('very long name takes two lines (must be ellipsized)', (WidgetTester tester) async { | ||
|
|
@@ -192,6 +203,7 @@ void main() { | |
| await setupPage(tester, users: [], dmMessages: [message], | ||
| newNameForSelfUser: name); | ||
| checkTitle(tester, name, 2); | ||
| checkBotIcon(count: 0); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('unread counts', (WidgetTester tester) async { | ||
|
|
@@ -205,39 +217,95 @@ void main() { | |
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| group('1:1', () { | ||
| group('has right avatar/title', () { | ||
| Future<void> checkRecipient(WidgetTester tester, { | ||
| required bool isBot, | ||
| required bool looksBot | ||
| }) async { | ||
| final user = eg.user(userId: 1, isBot: isBot); | ||
| final message = eg.dmMessage(from: eg.selfUser, to: [user]); | ||
| await setupPage(tester, users: [user], dmMessages: [message]); | ||
|
|
||
| checkAvatar(tester, DmNarrow.ofMessage(message, selfUserId: eg.selfUser.userId)); | ||
| checkTitle(tester, user.fullName); | ||
| checkBotIcon(count: looksBot ? 1 : 0); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('bot recipient -> shows bot icon', (tester) async { | ||
| await checkRecipient(tester, isBot: true, looksBot: true); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('non-bot recipient -> shows no bot icon', (tester) async { | ||
| await checkRecipient(tester, isBot: false, looksBot: false); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| group('no error when user somehow missing from store.users', () { | ||
| Future<void> checkRecipient(WidgetTester tester, { | ||
| required bool isBot, | ||
| required bool looksBot | ||
| }) async { | ||
| final user = eg.user(userId: 1, isBot: isBot); | ||
| final message = eg.dmMessage(from: eg.selfUser, to: [user]); | ||
| await setupPage(tester, | ||
| users: [], // exclude user | ||
| dmMessages: [message], | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| checkAvatar(tester, DmNarrow.ofMessage(message, selfUserId: eg.selfUser.userId)); | ||
| checkTitle(tester, '(unknown user)'); | ||
| checkBotIcon(count: looksBot ? 1 : 0); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('bot recipient -> shows no bot icon', (tester) async { | ||
| await checkRecipient(tester, isBot: true, looksBot: false); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('non-bot recipient -> shows no bot icon', (tester) async { | ||
| await checkRecipient(tester, isBot: false, looksBot: false); | ||
| }); | ||
|
Comment on lines
+260
to
+266
There was a problem hiding this comment. group('no error when user somehow missing from store.users', () {
// […]
testWidgets('bot recipient -> shows no bot icon', (tester) async {
await checkRecipient(tester, isBot: true, looksBot: false);
});
testWidgets('non-bot recipient -> shows no bot icon', (tester) async {
await checkRecipient(tester, isBot: false, looksBot: false);
});The "bot recipient" test doesn't actually simulate a bot recipient, right, because these tests are checking what happens when the user data is missing. I see that the Simplest I think to leave this test is it was, but with an added |
||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| group('short name takes one line', () { | ||
| Future<void> checkRecipient(WidgetTester tester, { | ||
| required bool isBot, | ||
| required bool looksBot | ||
| }) async { | ||
| final user = eg.user(userId: 1, fullName: 'Short name', isBot: isBot); | ||
| final message = eg.dmMessage(from: eg.selfUser, to: [user]); | ||
| await setupPage(tester, users: [user], dmMessages: [message]); | ||
| checkTitle(tester, user.fullName, 1); | ||
| checkBotIcon(count: looksBot ? 1 : 0); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('bot recipient -> shows bot icon', (tester) async { | ||
| await checkRecipient(tester, isBot: true, looksBot: true); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('non-bot recipient -> shows no bot icon', (tester) async { | ||
| await checkRecipient(tester, isBot: false, looksBot: false); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| group('very long name takes two lines (must be ellipsized)', () { | ||
| Future<void> checkRecipient(WidgetTester tester, { | ||
| required bool isBot, | ||
| required bool looksBot | ||
| }) async { | ||
| final user = eg.user(userId: 1, isBot: isBot, fullName: 'Long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name long name'); | ||
| final message = eg.dmMessage(from: eg.selfUser, to: [user]); | ||
| await setupPage(tester, users: [user], dmMessages: [message]); | ||
| checkTitle(tester, user.fullName, 2); | ||
| checkBotIcon(count: looksBot ? 1 : 0); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('bot recipient -> shows no bot icon', (WidgetTester tester) async { | ||
| await checkRecipient(tester, isBot: true, looksBot: false); | ||
| }); | ||
|
Comment on lines
+302
to
+304
There was a problem hiding this comment. We would like the bot icon to appear even when the name is long; see Alya's comment: #764 (comment) If that's hard to do and has to be left as a TODO, that might be OK, but we shouldn't have a test that confirms the undesired behavior. 🙂 |
||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('non-bot recipient -> shows no bot icon', (WidgetTester tester) async { | ||
| await checkRecipient(tester, isBot: false, looksBot: false); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('unread counts', (WidgetTester tester) async { | ||
|
|
@@ -251,51 +319,59 @@ void main() { | |
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| group('group', () { | ||
| List<User> usersList(int count, {List<int>? botUsers}) { | ||
| assert(() { | ||
| if (botUsers == null) return true; | ||
| for (int userIndex in botUsers) { | ||
| if (userIndex >= count) return false; | ||
| } | ||
| return true; | ||
| }()); | ||
| final result = <User>[]; | ||
| for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) { | ||
| result.add(eg.user(userId: i, fullName: 'User ${i.toString()}', | ||
| isBot: botUsers?.contains(i) ?? false)); | ||
| } | ||
| return result; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('has right title/avatar', (WidgetTester tester) async { | ||
| final users = usersList(3, botUsers: [0, 2]); | ||
| final message = eg.dmMessage(from: eg.selfUser, to: users); | ||
| await setupPage(tester, users: users, dmMessages: [message]); | ||
|
|
||
| checkAvatar(tester, DmNarrow.ofMessage(message, selfUserId: eg.selfUser.userId)); | ||
| checkTitle(tester, users.map((u) => u.fullName).join(', ')); | ||
| checkBotIcon(count: 2); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('no error when one user somehow missing from store.users', (WidgetTester tester) async { | ||
| final users = usersList(2, botUsers: [1]); | ||
| final message = eg.dmMessage(from: eg.selfUser, to: users); | ||
| await setupPage(tester, | ||
| users: [users[0]], // exclude user[1], which is bot | ||
| dmMessages: [message], | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| checkAvatar(tester, DmNarrow.ofMessage(message, selfUserId: eg.selfUser.userId)); | ||
| checkTitle(tester, '${users[0].fullName}, (unknown user)'); | ||
| checkBotIcon(count: 0); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('few names takes one line', (WidgetTester tester) async { | ||
| final users = usersList(2); | ||
| final message = eg.dmMessage(from: eg.selfUser, to: users); | ||
| await setupPage(tester, users: users, dmMessages: [message]); | ||
| checkTitle(tester, users.map((u) => u.fullName).join(', '), 1); | ||
| checkBotIcon(count: 0); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('very many names takes two lines (must be ellipsized)', (WidgetTester tester) async { | ||
| final users = usersList(40); | ||
| final message = eg.dmMessage(from: eg.selfUser, to: users); | ||
| await setupPage(tester, users: users, dmMessages: [message]); | ||
| checkTitle(tester, users.map((u) => u.fullName).join(', '), 2); | ||
| checkBotIcon(count: 0); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| testWidgets('unread counts', (WidgetTester tester) async { | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's put this in the new
DesignVariables, and use the new variable here and in the message list (where we added the bot icon for senders in #605).