new_dm: Add UI for starting new DM conversations by chimnayajith · Pull Request #1322 · zulip/zulip-flutter

chimnayajith · 2025-02-04T15:14:43Z

Pull Request

Description

This pull request adds the UI to starting new DM conversations.. A floating action button has been added to the RecentDmConversationsPage, which opens a bottom modal sheet, allowing users to select conversation participants and proceed to the MessageListPage.

Design reference: Figma

Related Issues

Closes Support starting a new DM conversation #127

Screenshots

Light mode

Dark mode

Additional Notes

The user list is currently sorted based on the recency of direct messages.

PIG208 · 2025-02-12T23:04:56Z

Thanks for working on this @chimnayajith!

I took a quick look at the implementation and checked the design. There are places where it currently does not match the Figma, for example:

          Container(
            width: MediaQuery.of(context).size.width,
            constraints: const BoxConstraints(
              minHeight: 44,
              maxHeight: 124,
            ),
            padding: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(horizontal: 16, vertical: 8),
            decoration: BoxDecoration(
              color: designVariables.bgSearchInput,
            ),
            child: SingleChildScrollView(
              controller: scrollController,
              child: Row(
                children: [
                  Expanded(
                    child: Wrap(
                      spacing: 4,
                      runSpacing: 4,

where the horizontal padding should be 14px;

and the spacing between the pills should be 6px.

I think there might be more places like this, so please sure to check your PR with the design and make sure that they match exactly.

While working on the next revision, please also try to break down the sheet into reasonable widgets, instead of a single one that encompasses the entire new DM page. There are also things like collapsing the closing brackets into a single line; you can find examples of that throughout the codebase:

      // [...]
        child: SafeArea(
          child: SizedBox(height: 48,
            child: Center(
              child: ConstrainedBox(
                // TODO(design): determine a suitable max width for bottom nav bar
                constraints: const BoxConstraints(maxWidth: 600),
                child: Row(
                  crossAxisAlignment: CrossAxisAlignment.stretch,
                  children: [
                    for (final navigationBarButton in navigationBarButtons)
                      Expanded(child: navigationBarButton),
                  ])))))));

All those changes will help make your PR more reviewable.

At the high-level, I think the user filtering code should re-use the AutocompleteView API, similar to what EmojiPicker does. However, We don't have a implementation for user auto-completion. While MentionAutocompleteView is close, it is also responsible for other tasks. Supporting that might require a good amount of refactoring and is less suited for a new contributor. So let's just try to focus on getting the UI right for this PR.

chimnayajith · 2025-02-16T06:25:23Z

@PIG208 Thanks for the review! I’ve made the necessary changes to match the Figma, and refactored the sheet into smaller widgets. I also followed the code style guidelines you mentioned.

I’ve pushed the revision—PTAL.

PIG208

Thanks for the update! I went through the implementation of the design (mainly layout but not the colors) and left some comments. I haven't read the tests yet, but it should be a good amount of feedback to work on a new revision for.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T19:49:23Z

+        width: 137,
+        height: 48,


Instead of setting the size definitely, let's express this in terms of paddings and minWidth/minHeight.

Because the "new dm" string can get translated (thus ends up having different width, or the user has a non-default font size, the actual width and height can vary.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T19:51:00Z

+          icon: Icon(Icons.add, size: 24),
+          label: Text(zulipLocalizations.newDmFabButtonLabel, style: TextStyle(fontSize: 20, fontWeight: FontWeight.w500)),


Do we have a way to control/verify the spacing between the icon and the label? In Figma it's 8px but from this code it is not obvious if it complies to the design.

The extendedIconLabelSpacing field for extended floating action buttons has a default value of 8.0. Should it still be specified?

Yeah. Because the default value can change (though unlikely), but we have a specific value in mind.

Have given it in the revision pushed.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T19:55:41Z

+
+void showNewDmSheet(BuildContext context) {
+  final store = PerAccountStoreWidget.of(context);
+  showModalBottomSheet<dynamic>(


Let's avoid dynamic. We in general follow Flutter's style guide.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T20:00:22Z

+  @override
+  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
+    return SizedBox(
+      height: MediaQuery.of(context).size.height * 0.95,


It doesn't seem right to size it this way. If the goal is to avoid the top of the bottom sheet overlapping with the device's top inset, see useSafeArea on showModalBottomSheet.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T20:02:59Z

+  }
+}
+
+class NewDmHeader extends StatelessWidget {


For helper widgets like this, let's make them private (_NewDmHeader) unless it is otherwise necessary.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T20:38:58Z

+              hintStyle: TextStyle(
+                fontSize: 17,
+                height: 1.0,
+                color: designVariables.textInput.withFadedAlpha(0.5)),


Looks like we do have a Figma variable for this: label-search-prompt.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T20:42:47Z

+        children: [
+          Avatar(userId: userId, size: 22, borderRadius: 3),
+          Padding(
+            padding: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(horizontal: 5, vertical: 3),


The end inset is not 5px:

Suggested change

padding: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(horizontal: 5, vertical: 3),

padding: EdgeInsetsDirectional.fromSTEB(5, 3, 4, 3),

We use EdgeInsetsDirectional because the start/end insets are different. This is for RTL where left and right are flipped.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T20:45:40Z

+
+  final List<User> filteredUsers;
+  final Set<int> selectedUserIds;
+  final void Function(int) onUserSelected;


The name of this is a bit misleading, because "selected" seems to indicate that the user is added to the list of selected user, when in reality it is more like toggling the selection of the user.

How about something like void Function(int userId) onUserTapped, with the parameter name.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T20:49:45Z

+  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
+    final designVariables = DesignVariables.of(context);
+
+    return ListView.builder(


There is an 8px top padding that applies to the scrollable:

I assume that's something that allows you to scroll over. Perhaps ListView.padding will be helpful.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T20:50:16Z

+          child: Padding(
+            padding: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(horizontal: 8, vertical: 2),
+            child: Container(
+              padding: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(horizontal: 8, vertical: 6),


Is the outer Padding redundant?

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T20:58:00Z

+    });
+  }
+
+  // Scroll to the search field when the user selects a user


Hmm, is this part of the UX specified in the design? It would be good to link to the relevant discussion/Figma if that's the case. Either way, I feel that it might be the best to leave this out from the initial implementation, to simplify things as we work it out.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T21:04:31Z

+          size: 24,
+          color: selectedUserIds.isEmpty
+            ? designVariables.icon.withFadedAlpha(0.5)
+            : designVariables.icon)]));


Square brackets are usually not wrapped, because they help indicate the end of a list and that the items before them are parallel.

PIG208 · 2025-02-21T21:05:12Z

+    super.key,
+    required this.searchController,
+    required this.scrollController,
+    required this.selectedUserIds});


Similarly, curly brackets are not wrapped, because they indicate the end of a parameter list, function, etc.

chimnayajith · 2025-02-25T15:17:09Z

@PIG208 Pushed a revision. PTAL!

alya · 2025-02-26T23:42:47Z

@chimnayajith Are the screenshots in the PR description up to date? Please update them if not.

chimnayajith · 2025-02-28T08:32:22Z

I've updated the screenshots. Please take a look!

alya · 2025-02-28T17:18:44Z

Let's change "Add Person" to "Add user", which will be more consistent with the web app. I'm not sure why your screenshots have varied capitalization, but in any case, only the first word should be capitalized.

alya · 2025-02-28T17:21:38Z

Actually, it would probably be better to match the web app more fully, if it doesn't feel too long in the mobile context.

"Add one or more users" before anyone is selected
"Add another user…" once someone is selected

alya · 2025-02-28T17:23:32Z

Why is there no "Add Person" in your last screenshot? What is different vs. the other ones?

chimnayajith · 2025-02-28T18:09:15Z

Continuing the discussion in CZO

chimnayajith · 2025-05-03T04:15:11Z

@PIG208 Pushed a revision. PTAL!

PIG208

Thanks for the revisions! Just a handful of comments.

PIG208 · 2025-05-07T18:22:22Z

+
+        await tester.tap(userTileFinder);
+        await tester.pump();
+


We should check nextButton here as well, so that we know that it's precisely the second tap that toggles the user selection

Wouldn't the suggested change make the 'deselecting a user' test redundant with the 'selecting a user' test, since the latter already checks that nextButton.onTap becomes non-null after selection?

Yeah, that's true. I think this probably suggests that these two tests can be combined together.

PIG208 · 2025-05-07T18:22:51Z

+        await tester.pump();
+        check(find.descendant(
+          of: selfUserTileFinder,
+          matching: find.byIcon(Icons.check_circle))).findsOne();


We should check eg.selfUser.fullName here too.

PIG208 · 2025-05-07T18:24:15Z

+      });
+      testWidgets('navigates to group DM on Next', (tester) async {


nit: missing newline

PIG208 · 2025-05-07T18:25:03Z

+          tester,
+          users: [],
+          expectedAppBarTitle: 'DMs with yourself',
+          isSelfDm: true);


Hmm, how about just passing users: [eg.selfUser]? That way we don't need to introduce a separate parameter.

PIG208 · 2025-05-07T18:29:25Z

+    final fabBgColor = _pressed
+      ? designVariables.fabBgPressed
+      : designVariables.fabBg;
+    final fabLabelColor = _pressed
+      ? designVariables.fabLabelPressed
+      : designVariables.fabLabel;
+    final fabShadowColor = _pressed
+      ? designVariables.fabShadowLow
+      : designVariables.fabShadowHigh;
+
+    return InkWell(
+      onTap: () => showNewDmSheet(context),
+      onTapDown: (_) => setState(() => _pressed = true),
+      onTapUp: (_) => setState(() => _pressed = false),
+      onTapCancel: () => setState(() => _pressed = false),
+      borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(28),
+      child: AnimatedContainer(
+        duration: const Duration(milliseconds: 100),
+        curve: Curves.easeOut,
+        padding: const EdgeInsetsDirectional.fromSTEB(16, 12, 20, 12),
+        decoration: BoxDecoration(
+          color: fabBgColor,
+          borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(28),
+          boxShadow: [
+            BoxShadow(
+              // TODO(design): Shadow colors barely visible in dark mode
+              color: fabShadowColor,
+              blurRadius: _pressed ? 12 : 16,
+              spreadRadius: 0,
+              offset: _pressed
+                ? const Offset(0, 2)
+                : const Offset(0, 4)),
+          ]),


Let's make boxShadow (normal and pressed states) design variables. We can use these values in light mode, and simply null in dark mode. See ComposeBoxTheme for example.

Looking at the design discussion on CZO thread it appears the decision is to have shadows in dark mode as well.

Given this, do I still need to follow the ComposeBoxTheme pattern with a separate theme extension class, or should I simply continue using designVariables.fabShadow directly in the button code as currently implemented?

Good question. To be clear, my suggestion was to just extract them to DesignVariables, not a separate theme class.

We usually prefer matching the name of design variables in code to Figma. Now that we do have such a variable, and that they are not otherwise different in light vs. dark mode, it should be fine without refactoring.

chimnayajith · 2025-05-12T15:49:05Z

@PIG208 Pushed a revision. PTAL!

PIG208

Thanks! Just a comment on the l10n descriptions. Marking this for Greg's review.

PIG208 · 2025-05-12T16:13:04Z

+    "description": "Hint text for the search bar when no users are selected"
+  },
+  "newDmSheetSearchHintSomeSelected": "Add another user…",
+  "@newDmSheetSearchHintSomeSelected": {
+    "description": "Hint text for the search bar when at least one user is selected"


nit: missing period at the end of the sentence

gnprice

Thanks @chimnayajith for building this, and thanks @PIG208 for the previous reviews!

Comments below. For this round, I've read the main new file down through the header and serach bar. Left for a future round are the user list, the changes in other widgets files, and the tests.

gnprice · 2025-05-12T21:00:26Z

+      if (user.fullName.toLowerCase().contains(
+            searchController.text.toLowerCase())) {


The searchController.text.toLowerCase() can be brought outside the loop, so that we do that computation just once instead of once per user.

gnprice · 2025-05-12T21:10:03Z

+      if (aLatestMessageId != null && bLatestMessageId != null) {
+        return bLatestMessageId.compareTo(aLatestMessageId);
+      }
+      if (aLatestMessageId != null) return -1;
+      if (bLatestMessageId != null) return 1;
+      return 0;


This is some fairly opaque logic. It's hard to tell if what it's doing is correct. A major reason why that's hard is that it's not explicit just what this is trying to do — so the reader has to guess, and then compare the logic they see to their guess at the intent, and if those don't match they can't be sure whether they've found a bug or their guess at the intent was wrong, so they may have to repeat several times with different guesses.

The main tactic for making this kind of code clear is to put it in its own method, with a clear name and doc comment.

We already have a method that does that, namely MentionAutocompleteView.compareRecentMessageIds, and its caller compareByDms which corresponds to this whole sort function. So it'd be best to just call MentionAutocompleteView.compareByDms.

gnprice · 2025-05-12T21:15:22Z

+  // TODO: switch to using an `AutocompleteView` for users
+  void _updateFilteredUsers(PerAccountStore store) {


Even though in this version we're not using the full machinery of AutocompleteView, let's do apply one of the key optimizations that MentionAutocompleteView makes:

Have a List<User> sortedUsers. Compute that just once, at the start of the interaction, with a full list of all users.

Then when the user edits their search filter, compute filteredUsers by going through that list, without repeating the sorting.

gnprice · 2025-05-12T21:17:33Z

+
+  void _handleUserTap(int userId) {
+    final store = PerAccountStoreWidget.of(context);
+    final newSelectedUserIds = Set<int>.from(selectedUserIds);


Instead of copying this Set, we can mutate the existing one. We don't have a need for the old value.

gnprice · 2025-05-12T21:21:47Z

+        Navigator.pop(context);
+        Navigator.push(context,
+          MessageListPage.buildRoute(context: context, narrow: narrow));


Perhaps Navigator.pushReplacement? How does the behavior differ between pop-then-push and that method?

gnprice · 2025-05-12T21:52:35Z

+        child: Row(children: [
+          Expanded(child: Wrap(


Is this a Row that always has one child? What if we just use the child directly?

But that would mean Expanded directly inside SingleChildScrollView which results in an error.

Yeah, the Expanded is really part of the Row protocol — what I meant was to use the child of the Expanded directly.

It looks like Chris cleared this up as part of #1554:
a8751e4
So I guess what this Row-plus-Expanded was accomplishing was to make the Wrap take up the full width. That can be done more directly by setting CrossAxisAlignment.stretch on the parent Column.

gnprice · 2025-05-12T21:55:20Z

+    return Container(
+      constraints: const BoxConstraints(
+        minHeight: 44,
+        maxHeight: 124),
+      padding: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(horizontal: 14, vertical: 11),


Do these constraints apply to the size including the padding, or excluding it?

My guess is they include the padding. But I'm not sure. I'd have to study the Container docs, and/or implementation, to be sure.

Instead let's handle the constraints and the padding in two separate widgets. That way it'll be very clear right here in our code which one is on the outside of which.

gnprice · 2025-05-12T22:02:15Z

+          color: designVariables.labelSearchPrompt,
+          fontSize: 17,
+          height: 22 / 17),
+        border: InputBorder.none));


nit: group properties logically; border is closely related to contentPadding (much more so than either of them is to the hint), so make them adjacent

gnprice · 2025-05-12T22:06:37Z

+      child: Row(
+        mainAxisSize: MainAxisSize.min,
+        children: [
+          Avatar(userId: userId, size: 22, borderRadius: 3),


nit: can make compact and reduce indentation:

Suggested change

child: Row(

mainAxisSize: MainAxisSize.min,

children: [

Avatar(userId: userId, size: 22, borderRadius: 3),

child: Row(mainAxisSize: MainAxisSize.min, children: [

Avatar(userId: userId, size: 22, borderRadius: 3),

gnprice · 2025-05-12T22:07:41Z

+          Avatar(userId: userId, size: 22, borderRadius: 3),
+          Padding(
+            padding: const EdgeInsetsDirectional.fromSTEB(5, 3, 4, 3),
+            child: Text(user?.fullName ?? zulipLocalizations.unknownUserName,


We have a centralized getter for this. (It might be new since you began work on this feature.) Search for references to unknownUserName.

gnprice · 2025-05-13T23:47:30Z

I have this running now in the build on my device.

One quick comment from playing with it: when I select a user from the list of results, the search text I've entered should get cleared. Effectively by choosing a user I'm completing the name I had started typing as text.

gnprice · 2025-05-16T22:13:52Z

+                fontSize: 20,
+                height: 30 / 20,
+              ).merge(weightVariableTextStyle(context, wght: 600)),
+              overflow: TextOverflow.ellipsis,


Does this overflow parameter have any effect without maxLines? Reading docs, I believe it doesn't.

gnprice · 2025-05-28T20:12:12Z

Vlad offered some updates and feedback for the design of this page:
#mobile > Flutter DMs flow design review @ 💬

Specifically I think items 0, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 are things to be updated on this PR. (Item 5 is the same as my comment #1322 (comment) above.) Items 2, 7, and 8 are out of scope.

Note also later discussion in that thread, in particular the updates to item 1 at #mobile > Flutter DMs flow design review @ 💬.

gnprice · 2025-05-29T01:26:38Z

Thanks again @chimnayajith for all your work on this PR!

The new app's launch is just a few weeks away now (#mobile-team > Flutter beta timeline @ 💬), and this is one of the M5a launch-blocker issues we want to be sure to have completed before then. Since it looks like you don't currently have time to make revisions to this PR, I've asked @chrisbobbe to pick it up from here so we can be sure to have it finished soon.

chimnayajith · 2025-05-29T02:45:36Z

Sorry for the delay — I’ve been caught up with a few things, but I'm available now and can resume work on this starting today. If it's okay, I’d like to continue with the PR and make the necessary revisions. Let me know if that works!

gnprice · 2025-05-29T02:47:51Z

OK, that works 🙂 — please go ahead.

We are on a tight timeline for this one (unlike our usual habits), so if at some point in the next week or two you're busy again, just let us know and we'll pick it up.

Add a modal bottom sheet UI for starting direct messages: - Search and select users from global list - Support single and group DMs - Navigate to message list after selection Design reference: https://www.figma.com/design/1JTNtYo9memgW7vV6d0ygq/Zulip-Mobile?node-id=4903-31879&p=f&t=pQP4QcxpccllCF7g-0 Fixes: zulip#127

chimnayajith · 2025-06-01T18:36:23Z

Pushed a revision. PTAL.

Specifically I think items 0, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6 are things to be updated on this PR.

Had a few doubts about some of these items. Started a CZO thread for the same.

Also the app_en.arb and other related files seems to already have an older version of the strings coming from this commit -> bb1ca88

gnprice · 2025-06-11T04:02:46Z

Thanks @chimnayajith for the revision!

It looks like @chrisbobbe has sent a new version, based on this revision, as #1554. So I'll close this PR in order to continue the thread there. (See also #1554 (comment) for Chris's detailed feedback on this revision, and #1554 (review) for my comments, many of which apply to this version.)

gnprice added the maintainer review PR ready for review by Zulip maintainers label Feb 4, 2025

gnprice assigned PIG208 Feb 4, 2025

chimnayajith force-pushed the 127-new-dm branch 4 times, most recently from b407738 to d8818a2 Compare February 6, 2025 18:21

PIG208 self-requested a review February 12, 2025 20:46

chimnayajith force-pushed the 127-new-dm branch 3 times, most recently from 0bc3e12 to a6cc695 Compare February 16, 2025 06:23

PIG208 reviewed Feb 21, 2025

View reviewed changes

chimnayajith force-pushed the 127-new-dm branch 3 times, most recently from 9439a4a to e033db5 Compare February 24, 2025 16:10

chimnayajith requested a review from PIG208 February 25, 2025 15:16

chimnayajith force-pushed the 127-new-dm branch from e033db5 to 126c4cc Compare February 28, 2025 18:30

Dhanesh-Sawant mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2025

new dm : page to start a new dm conversation #1252

Closed

chimnayajith force-pushed the 127-new-dm branch from 126c4cc to a8bcda8 Compare March 15, 2025 05:17

chimnayajith force-pushed the 127-new-dm branch from 7eb7984 to 76ccab3 Compare May 2, 2025 18:57

PIG208 reviewed May 7, 2025

View reviewed changes

chimnayajith force-pushed the 127-new-dm branch from 76ccab3 to 13a4acd Compare May 12, 2025 05:02

PIG208 reviewed May 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

PIG208 added integration review Added by maintainers when PR may be ready for integration and removed maintainer review PR ready for review by Zulip maintainers labels May 12, 2025

PIG208 assigned gnprice and unassigned PIG208 May 12, 2025

PIG208 requested a review from gnprice May 12, 2025 16:20

gnprice reviewed May 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

gnprice reviewed May 16, 2025

View reviewed changes

gnprice added the maintainer review PR ready for review by Zulip maintainers label May 29, 2025

gnprice assigned chrisbobbe May 29, 2025

chimnayajith force-pushed the 127-new-dm branch 2 times, most recently from 6d756de to f144ba6 Compare June 1, 2025 16:32

chimnayajith force-pushed the 127-new-dm branch from f144ba6 to 9daabee Compare June 1, 2025 17:38

This was referenced Jun 3, 2025

msglist: When the initial message fetch comes up empty, auto-focus the compose box #1543

Closed

home: Add placeholder text for empty Inbox, Channels, and Direct messages #1552

Merged

new-dm: Add UI for starting new DM conversation (Chris's revision) #1554

Merged

gnprice closed this Jun 11, 2025

		icon: Icon(Icons.add, size: 24),
		label: Text(zulipLocalizations.newDmFabButtonLabel, style: TextStyle(fontSize: 20, fontWeight: FontWeight.w500)),

	padding: const EdgeInsets.symmetric(horizontal: 5, vertical: 3),
	padding: EdgeInsetsDirectional.fromSTEB(5, 3, 4, 3),

		});
		testWidgets('navigates to group DM on Next', (tester) async {

		if (user.fullName.toLowerCase().contains(
		searchController.text.toLowerCase())) {

		// TODO: switch to using an `AutocompleteView` for users
		void _updateFilteredUsers(PerAccountStore store) {

Conversation

chimnayajith commented Feb 4, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Pull Request

Description

Related Issues

Screenshots

Light mode

Dark mode

Additional Notes

Uh oh!

PIG208 commented Feb 12, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

chimnayajith commented Feb 16, 2025

Uh oh!

PIG208 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

PIG208 Feb 25, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

chimnayajith commented Feb 25, 2025

Uh oh!

alya commented Feb 26, 2025

Uh oh!

chimnayajith commented Feb 28, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

alya commented Feb 28, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

alya commented Feb 28, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

alya commented Feb 28, 2025

Uh oh!

chimnayajith commented Feb 28, 2025

Uh oh!

chimnayajith commented May 3, 2025

Uh oh!

PIG208 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

chimnayajith commented Feb 4, 2025 •

edited

Loading

PIG208 commented Feb 12, 2025 •

edited

Loading

PIG208 Feb 25, 2025 •

edited

Loading

chimnayajith commented Feb 28, 2025 •

edited

Loading

alya commented Feb 28, 2025 •

edited

Loading

alya commented Feb 28, 2025 •

edited

Loading