-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.6k
Fix bluetooth shell issue #90065
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
kartben
merged 3 commits into
zephyrproject-rtos:main
from
nxp-upstream:fix_bt_shell_issue
May 28, 2025
Merged
Fix bluetooth shell issue #90065
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wouldn't it be more accurate like this?:
I believe it's more accurate because we don't really care about what the type of the disconnected connection is for the purpose of selecting a different connection.
I don't know what the difference between BT_CONN_TYPE_BR and BT_CONN_TYPE_SCO is, so it may be SCO is correct instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi alwa-nordic, as the comments from Thalley, he expects to set a new default conn with the same type first.
Consider a requirement: If there are 4 connections: 2 LE and 2 BR/EDR, and the disconnected one is a BR/EDR, and we want to select the other BR/EDR connection.
SCO disconnection will not reach this callback and will use its own callback.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK. I'll defer to @Thalley's decision.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively we could remove the "select next" feature.
The reasoning is that if I was doing some GATT operations on an LE
default_conn
, and then it disconnects, then I'd assume I could either continue with GATT operations, or not do any operations.Perhaps the "select next" feature isn't that useful for multiple different types of connections?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If this PR #90123 is merged, and we use
bt select
andbr select
shell command to select different types of connections. After that, the "select next" may be removed.Anyway, the "select next" provide the possibility to be unnecessary to enter
bt select
orbr select
.