Skip to content

Conversation

@pdgendt
Copy link
Collaborator

@pdgendt pdgendt commented Apr 17, 2025

When running code coverage checks, ignore the special casing for TYPE_CHECKING

When running code coverage checks, ignore the special casing for
TYPE_CHECKING

Signed-off-by: Pieter De Gendt <[email protected]>
@pdgendt pdgendt force-pushed the coverage-typecheck branch from 5fa48fa to 5be328a Compare April 17, 2025 12:13
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.23%. Comparing base (3585a73) to head (5be328a).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #809      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.18%   84.23%   -0.95%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        3334     3318      -16     
==========================================
- Hits         2840     2795      -45     
- Misses        494      523      +29     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@marc-hb
Copy link
Collaborator

marc-hb commented Apr 17, 2025

I have no idea what this does, sorry. Would you have pointers to before/after logs/results?

@pdgendt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

pdgendt commented Apr 17, 2025

I have no idea what this does, sorry. Would you have pointers to before/after logs/results?

You can ignore this draft PR for now, is a test.

@marc-hb
Copy link
Collaborator

marc-hb commented Apr 17, 2025

You can ignore this draft PR for now, is a test.

I wish GitHub provided a way to exclude drafts (and only drafts) from notifications but last time I checked it was not possible :-(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants