feat: suggest npm scripts over Grunt or Gulp in first learning flow #846
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
✅ Deploy Preview for yeoman ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
|
+1 on that. In my opinion Bower and should be removed from the site. And probably Grunt as well. |
|
In my opinion bower, gulp and grunt should be removed. gulp-plugins are somewhat supported in generator api. |
UlisesGascon
approved these changes
Jan 25, 2025
|
Thanks all! Agreed with the removals of the older tools, especially Bower and Grunt. Filed: #851 to overhaul them. I'll go ahead and merge this quick improvement now in the meantime. Cheers! 🎩 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose of this pull request?
What changes did you make?
Fixes #416.
Suggests npm scripts in the two main places that mention Grunt and Gulp as potential build systems:
/under Tools/learningunder Basic ScaffoldingIs there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?
Is there anywhere else we'd want the phrasing to be updated? After #417 I think much of the decoupling was already done. I found the rest of the site to be pretty good at keeping things agnostic, but didn't dive too deep.