Use first user account on attached Android devices

[ericswpark]

Description

Fixes #4396

This hardcodes the user ID of 0 when fetching the package list on Android, otherwise it will fail on devices that have multiple users (devices with the work profile or Samsung Secure Folder (Knox) enabled).

• This pull request addresses the issue described here: Detox test fails to install and launch if Samsung Secure Folder is enabled #4396

In this pull request, I have hardcoded in a value of user ID 0 when listing packages using ADB.

This should work in the majority of cases -- however there might be some developers that want to test their app in a work profile. I really need Android tests to work right now, so I just hardcoded in the ID value, but maybe a future PR can make this a configurable option. I don't foresee a ton of use for this as there aren't any issues filed about it (other than mine).

---

None of the below are applicable.

For features/enhancements:

• I have added/updated the relevant references in the documentation files.

For API changes:

• I have made the necessary changes in the types index file.

[ericswpark]

Just a quick note: the value of 0 is the default for any Android device, and even Expo uses it in their codebase, see: expo/expo@275d855 (yes they have it user configurable but the default value set is 0)

[noomorph]

@ericswpark, I see what the idea is, but I need to make sure whether this is actually the ONLY place that needs this addition. For now, I suggest using patch-package, if this helps you.

I'll try to find a spare time to look at this more closely in a week or two, with some Android phone at my disposal.

[ericswpark]

@noomorph I know you want to take a closer look to see if there are additional places that need the patch, but can those be added in a separate PR/branch? I've been running with the patch for the last few weeks and it has been rock stable so far.

[stale]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.
For more information on bots in this repository, read this discussion.

[stale]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.
For more information on bots in this repository, read this discussion.

[ericswpark]

@noomorph may I request a review on this PR? The stale bot keeps nagging every now and then.

[stale]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.
For more information on bots in this repository, read this discussion.

[stale]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.
For more information on bots in this repository, read this discussion.

[stale]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.
For more information on bots in this repository, read this discussion.

[stale]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.
Thank you for your contributions.
For more information on bots in this repository, read this discussion.