Publication Prep

[egekorkan]

I have done the following:

• Copied https://github.com/w3c/wot-thing-description/blob/main/publication/ver11/4-wd/README.md as indicated by ToDos for publication #289
• Beautified the file, updated the links accordingly, added the commands, made it more instructive
• generated static.html, tidied up with HTML Tidy to generate Overview.html

Validation results (No need to manually update):

• Link Checker - No errors (it shows an error for this Note's link)
• Pubrules Checker: Errors exist but they can be ignored.
  • There are some errors from Netlify that can be ignored.
  • The center error from the HTML Validator is also here. It can be ignored.
• CSS Checker - No errors
• HTML Validator - There is an error about using <center> but this is coming from Netlify and can be ignored.

---

Preview | Diff

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for wot-binding-templates ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	3563204
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/wot-binding-templates/deploys/646fd62b122a020008262c48
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-290--wot-binding-templates.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

[egekorkan]

The Netlify version can be used for the pubrules check: https://deploy-preview-290--wot-binding-templates.netlify.app/publication/note3/overview

[egekorkan]

Pubrules error: [EXCEPTION] The document "Web of Things (WoT) Binding Templates" seems to be an Editor's Draft, which is not supported.

It is not clear from previous instructions on what needs to be changed to move from ED to Note

[egekorkan]

Call of 24.05:

• The respec parameter should be changed to "Note" from "ED" and the process should be done again.

• Document the HTML Tidy commands to write to the Overview.html file

• Once the static HTML is generated, go through the link checker, validation checker and pubrules.

  • https://validator.w3.org/
  • https://validator.w3.org/checklink
    (these should be linked once the pubrules checker is working)

• Add https://www.w3.org/Guide to the readme

[egekorkan]

All the checks except some CSS that is generated by respec are passing. @danielpeintner did you have the same issue in Scripting API? You can find them at the CSS validator or in the HTML validator of W3C.

[danielpeintner]

@danielpeintner did you have the same issue in Scripting API?

We did run into some other ReSpec issues, see w3c/wot-scripting-api#480

[egekorkan]

OK so I checked where the error comes from and it is not due to respec, also not the errors like in @danielpeintner case above. The static HTML generated from respec is correct but HTML tidy adds errors.

CSS validation of static.html

[egekorkan]

The addition of CDATA seems to be a bug that others counter (see here). I will go around this issue for now.