Skip to content

Tweaks to how charter refinement concludes #1037

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

frivoal
Copy link
Collaborator

@frivoal frivoal commented Apr 28, 2025

Based on feedback recently received.

This keeps things largely as they were, but reworks the text to be more explicit about a few things:

  • The Team is actually supposed to make a decision at the end of the refinement phase; de-facto abandonment is a way to handle accidentally forgetting to do so, not a valid deliberate choice
  • The Team has to announce (and give rationale) for its decisions
  • If the Team (accidentally) abandons a refinement by letting it expire, they can still issue a (different) decision when they notice, without having to start a whole new refinement.

Preview | Diff

This keeps things largely as they were, but reworks the text to be more
explicit about a few things:
* The Team is actually supposed to make a decision at the end of the
  refinement phase; de-facto abandonment is a way to handle accidentally
  forgetting to do so, not a valid deliberate choice
* The Team has to announced (and give rationale) for its decisions
* If the Team (accidentally) abandons a refinement by letting it expire,
  they can still issue a (different) decision when they notice,
  without having to start a whole new refinement.
@frivoal frivoal added Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call topic: Chartering labels Apr 28, 2025
frivoal and others added 2 commits April 30, 2025 10:16
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@tantek tantek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense. Added a minor rewording suggestion for readability and clarity. Editor's discretion to reject, incorporate, or iterate as preferred.

Co-authored-by: Tantek Çelik <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call topic: Chartering
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants