-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New work item: crate r2c2_term
#6
Open
pchampin
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
new-work-item-term
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ | |
|
||
members = [ | ||
"dummy", | ||
"term", | ||
] | ||
resolver = "3" | ||
|
||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ | ||
[package] | ||
name = "r2c2_term" | ||
version.workspace = true | ||
authors.workspace = true | ||
edition.workspace = true | ||
repository.workspace = true | ||
readme.workspace = true | ||
license-file.workspace = true | ||
keywords.workspace = true | ||
|
||
[dependencies] | ||
|
||
[lints] | ||
workspace = true |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | ||
//! TODO | ||
//! One POSSIBLE way forward is to | ||
//! 1. define or import simple wrapper types for building blocks | ||
//! (IRIs, language tags...) | ||
//! 2. define traits for different kinds of terms | ||
//! (Subject, Predicate, Object, GraphName) | ||
//! but the final design may be different. | ||
|
||
#[cfg(test)] | ||
mod test {} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is imho going a bit too much into the "how" direction. It does not sound obvious that these should be traits and not enums.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll argue in favor of traits here:
What I aim is to avoid as much data transformation as possible when communicating between two implementations. That's why I try to favor lighweight wrapper types, and traits.
Imagine I want to consume some triples produced by
oxttl
to canonicalize them withsohpia_c14n
. (I'll focus on subjects but of course the same would apply to predicates and objects). IfSubject
was an enum, I would have to transform the subjects produced byoxttl
into that enum. And thensophia_c14n
would have to transform this enum again into its own internal representation.If OTOH
Subject
is a trait, which the types ofoxttl
implement, and whichsophia_c14n
accepts as input, then the data produced byoxttl
can be passed directly tosophia_c14n
, which then will transform it directly into its own internal representation. That's one transformation less.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On the other side having an enum makes manipulation easier. I tend to think this is a compromise to be done when we know more about how we represent IRIs/blank nodes/... and should not be set in stone at the beginning of this work item.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm happy to defer this discussion, the goal was not to set anything in stone. I've just pushed a commit to clarify that the proposed design was just an example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! Perfect!