feat: expand tool catalog

[vnedyalk0v]

Summary

• Add verified Homebrew-backed catalog entries for containers, infrastructure,
  devops tools, browsers, AI tools, IDEs, and terminals.
• Add the new terminal category label, keep the spec examples aligned, and
  cover the expanded catalog in tests.

Checklist

• Base branch is dev (only dev or hotfix/* may target main).
• Branch name uses a repo prefix (feat/, fix/, bug/, docs/,
  chore/, ci/, or refactor/) unless this is the main -> dev sync.
• PR title starts with feat:, fix:, bug:, docs:, chore:, ci:,
  or refactor:.
• The change matches docs/rig-v1-spec.md or updates the spec.
• User-facing behavior is documented.
• Security-sensitive behavior is documented or called out.
• Dry-run behavior remains side-effect free.
• Shell code that runs on a clean Mac is Bash 3.2-compatible.
• Shell/config edits are idempotent.

Validation

for f in install.sh rig lib/rig/*.sh scripts/*.sh tests/*.sh; do bash -n "$f"; done
bash tests/run-tests.sh
./scripts/validate-catalog.sh
./rig install --dry-run --select vscode,chrome,node-npm --defaults finder-show-hidden-files
./install.sh --dry-run
shellcheck install.sh rig lib/rig/*.sh scripts/*.sh tests/*.sh
actionlint .github/workflows/*.yml
git diff --check

Security Impact

This expands selectable catalog data and adds a prompt label for the new
terminal category. It does not add a new external installer strategy, shell
profile mutation path, generated-file format, macOS defaults behavior, or
update behavior. The new dry-run coverage verifies the added selections render
as Homebrew-native Brewfile entries and remain side-effect free.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Updated catalog examples to include additional IDEs, terminals (Antigravity, Ghostty, Warp), and AI tools with revised installation strategies
  • Added container tools (OrbStack, Docker Desktop) to example catalog

• Tests

  • Expanded test coverage for IDE and terminal categories
  • Enhanced dry-run testing with expanded catalog selections
  • Updated prompt progress tracking from 8 to 9 steps

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@vnedyalk0v, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 31 minutes and 55 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: e86dc510-f5ce-4945-a551-81364376196a

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6d1f804 and d7ea788.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• catalog/tools.tsv is excluded by !**/*.tsv

📒 Files selected for processing (6)

• docs/rig-v1-spec.md
• lib/rig/catalog.sh
• lib/rig/common.sh
• lib/rig/plan.sh
• lib/rig/prompts.sh
• tests/run-tests.sh

Walkthrough

The PR expands catalog category support by introducing the terminal category. The spec is updated with new IDE, terminal, AI tool, and container examples; the prompt label function gains terminal category recognition; and test coverage is extended to validate the new listings and a larger expanded catalog selection scenario while adjusting progress count expectations.

Changes

Terminal category and test expansion

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Terminal category spec and label rendering docs/rig-v1-spec.md, lib/rig/prompts.sh	Catalog examples in the spec now include new IDE/terminal/AI/container entries. rig_category_label in prompts.sh recognizes terminal category and outputs "Terminals".
Test coverage for categories and expanded selections tests/run-tests.sh	New rig list tests validate ide and terminal category output with expected labels and entries. Expanded dry-run test exercises larger --select lists. Interactive prompt progress count updated from 8 to 9 steps throughout test suite.

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title uses the approved 'feat:' prefix and concisely describes the main change: expanding the tool catalog with new entries for various categories.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description follows the template, includes a clear summary, completes the checklist with all items marked as done, provides comprehensive validation commands, and documents the security impact.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch feat/expand-catalog

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 6d1f8046bd

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".