-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
Use execute_model for warmup #26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from 13 commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e79c317
execute_model with a warm up mode
rafvasq 3a627a5
Remove funcs and prints
rafvasq 2603096
Fix
rafvasq 8e94e8a
Lints
rafvasq 74c0f60
Another refactor to leave execute_model untouched
rafvasq d29de93
this one too
rafvasq e5177ac
Small lint
rafvasq 99ac9d4
Removes _raw_model_forward
rafvasq e555ecf
Attempt a revamp
rafvasq 79ee4c4
Update prints to logger
rafvasq aca9c1f
Merge branch 'main' into refactor-warmup
rafvasq 972fc87
Lints, fixes prints
rafvasq b9c03b6
Move function back
rafvasq 4a48c7b
Fix logging typos
rafvasq a6b8e25
:bug: fix batch handling in V1 runner (#33)
joerunde 45cec8f
Refactor forward_pass, update comments/logs for clarity
rafvasq daa6ded
Merge branch 'main' into refactor-warmup
rafvasq File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personally, I am for the use of helper functions wherever they help reducing code duplication. I am aware its just 10 lines here, but they could be eliminated by reusing the
_warmup_model_forward_pass
we introduced in the original implementation.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good, I re-introduced
_warmup_model_forward_pass
to handle the duplicate pass code