Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add linearizable support to VSchema management #17401

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Add linearizable support to VSchema management #17401

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+235 −173

Conversation

mattlord
Copy link
Contributor

@mattlord mattlord commented Dec 17, 2024 •
edited by harshit-gangal
Loading

Description

Related Issue(s)

Checklist

  • "Backport to:" labels have been added if this change should be back-ported to release branches
  • If this change is to be back-ported to previous releases, a justification is included in the PR description
  • Tests were added or are not required
  • Did the new or modified tests pass consistently locally and on CI?
  • Documentation was added or is not required

@vitess-bot vitess-bot
Copy link
Contributor

vitess-bot bot commented Dec 17, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot added NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says labels Dec 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v22.0.0 milestone Dec 17, 2024
@mattlord mattlord force-pushed the vschema_topo_version branch 4 times, most recently from 4b4578d to be1ccd1 Compare December 18, 2024 22:11
@mattlord mattlord added Component: Query Serving Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature) and removed NeedsWebsiteDocsUpdate What it says NeedsIssue A linked issue is missing for this Pull Request NeedsBackportReason If backport labels have been applied to a PR, a justification is required labels Dec 18, 2024
@mattlord
Get all e2e tests working
b2e2ba6 
Signed-off-by: Matt Lord <[email protected]>
@mattlord mattlord force-pushed the vschema_topo_version branch from be1ccd1 to b2e2ba6 Compare December 19, 2024 22:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps Awaiting requested review from rohit-nayak-ps rohit-nayak-ps will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review rohit-nayak-ps is a code owner

@deepthi deepthi Awaiting requested review from deepthi deepthi will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review deepthi is a code owner

@harshit-gangal harshit-gangal Awaiting requested review from harshit-gangal harshit-gangal will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review harshit-gangal is a code owner

@systay systay Awaiting requested review from systay systay will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review systay is a code owner

@frouioui frouioui Awaiting requested review from frouioui frouioui will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review frouioui is a code owner

@GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 Awaiting requested review from GuptaManan100 GuptaManan100 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review GuptaManan100 is a code owner

@ajm188 ajm188 Awaiting requested review from ajm188 ajm188 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review ajm188 is a code owner

@notfelineit notfelineit Awaiting requested review from notfelineit notfelineit will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review notfelineit is a code owner

At least 2 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Component: Query Serving NeedsDescriptionUpdate The description is not clear or comprehensive enough, and needs work Type: Enhancement Logical improvement (somewhere between a bug and feature)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v22.0.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add versioning to the low level topo interface for VSchemas using the existing Info struct model
1 participant
@mattlord