Fix incorrect comment about LRU clock resolution in initObjectLRUOrLFU

[johnwonder]

No description provided.

[enjoy-binbin]

are you sure? i forgot the details but i see the function is named LFUGetTimeInMinutes

[johnwonder]

are you sure? i forgot the details but i see the function is named LFUGetTimeInMinutes

yes,because "seconds resolution" points to the lruclock,and the "or alternatively the LFU counter" sentence that follows is specifically for the LFUGetTimeInMinutes method

[enjoy-binbin]

ok, i see, however we have this #2857 change at the same time, i am guessing #2857 will make this PR become a dead code...

[johnwonder]

ok, i see, however we have this #2857 change at the same time, i am guessing #2857 will make this PR become a dead code...

It's okay. I just noticed this issue in Redis,so I dropped by valkey to take a look

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.46%. Comparing base (d16788e) to head (c4f4059).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on unstable.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           unstable    #2882      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     72.45%   72.46%   +0.01%     
============================================
  Files           128      128              
  Lines         70485    70485              
============================================
+ Hits          51068    51078      +10     
+ Misses        19417    19407      -10     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/object.c	82.04% <ø> (ø)

... and 15 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[JimB123]

Yes, there were comments in 5 different files indicating the mechanism for LRU/LFU. With #2857 it localizes that knowledge and eliminates this comment issue.