-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Package review PR #1
base: test
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
61aa1fb
to
0e4d4d1
Compare
src/commands/bloom.rs
Outdated
let mut result = Vec::new(); | ||
match value { | ||
Some(bf) => { | ||
for item in input_args.iter().take(argc).skip(idx) { | ||
result.push(RedisValue::Integer(bf.add_item(item.as_slice()))); | ||
} | ||
Ok(RedisValue::Array(result)) | ||
} | ||
None => { | ||
if nocreate { | ||
return Err(RedisError::Str("ERR not found")); | ||
} | ||
let mut bf = BloomFilterType::new_reserved(fp_rate, capacity, expansion); | ||
for item in input_args.iter().take(argc).skip(idx) { | ||
result.push(RedisValue::Integer(bf.add_item(item.as_slice()))); | ||
} | ||
match filter_key.set_value(&BLOOM_FILTER_TYPE, bf) { | ||
Ok(_) => Ok(RedisValue::Array(result)), | ||
Err(_) => Err(RedisError::Str(ERROR)), | ||
} | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we check the bloom filter exists or not first and then insert the data in a single flow. Don't like the code duplication around insertion.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can create a separate function for multi adds and call it from both flows. I wanted to handle both through the same flow, however it will be out of reference scope and result in a moved error
src/commands/bloom_util.rs
Outdated
pub struct BloomFilterType { | ||
pub expansion: u32, | ||
pub fp_rate: f32, | ||
pub filters: Vec<BloomFilter>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does the underlying support scalable bloom filters or do we need to support this mechanism?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This particular library does not have auto scaling
https://docs.rs/bloomfilter/1.0.13/bloomfilter/struct.Bloom.html
src/commands/bloom_util.rs
Outdated
let new_capacity = filter.capacity * self.expansion; | ||
let mut new_filter = BloomFilter::new(self.fp_rate, new_capacity); | ||
// Add item. | ||
new_filter.bloom.set(item); | ||
new_filter.num_items += 1; | ||
self.filters.push(new_filter); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't we fail the request if the expansion is much higher than we can support?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
expansion
really means expansion_rate. I can rename this variable if that would help clarify this.
I don't think there is a limit on the number of sub filters an object can have. But (if we want) we can define a config for this to either silently fail expansion (by allowing a set
) beyond a limit of X sub filters per object OR explicitly return an error (without a set
).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One other aspect we should handle this checking / rejecting based on memory overhead of every operation that creates a new BloomFilter object (BF.ADD, BF.MADD, BD.RESERVE, BF.INSERT, RDB Load). Before any of these operations, we should probably check the memory usage and reject the operations if there is not sufficient space. We have a mechanism to compute the estimated additional memory overhead per creation.
055728d
to
7027032
Compare
c87fd97
to
869a254
Compare
Signed-off-by: Viktor Söderqvist <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Madelyn Olson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
… objects. Update RDB load/save Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
…ters and memory_bytes. Additionally updated drop and created tests around this new info handler (#19) Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]>
* add bf.load and bf.dump to support bloom filter aofrewrite. Signed-off-by: wuranxx <[email protected]> add version in BloomFilterType. change bf.load behavior: bf.load can't override exists keys. Signed-off-by: wuranxx <[email protected]> * remove bf.dump. add bloom filter encode decode comment. add unit test for decode error case. Signed-off-by: wuranxx <[email protected]> * 1. Currently, the version field is added to the array only encode. 2. Add metrics when decode bloomFilterType. 3. Add metrics test when load bloom filter from aof. Signed-off-by: wuranxx <[email protected]> * 1. Add filter bytes check and unit test. 2. Fixed some comments and returned error messages. Signed-off-by: wuranxx <[email protected]> * fix `test_bf_decode_when_bytes_is_exceed_limit_should_failed` unit test. Signed-off-by: wuranxx <[email protected]> * Add expansion maximum value check to filter decode. Signed-off-by: wuranxx <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: wuranxx <[email protected]>
e74b825
to
188835b
Compare
Signed-off-by: Vanessa Tang <[email protected]>
188835b
to
a33e0e3
Compare
* Support for DEBUG DIGEST module data type callback Signed-off-by: Nihal Mehta <[email protected]> * Update test cases Signed-off-by: Nihal Mehta <[email protected]> * Move digest to wrapper Signed-off-by: Nihal Mehta <[email protected]> * Update tests Signed-off-by: Nihal Mehta <[email protected]> * Add more scenarios for debug test Signed-off-by: Nihal Mehta <[email protected]> * Clean code and add scenario for debug test Signed-off-by: Nihal Mehta <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: Nihal Mehta <[email protected]>
3f24e34
to
7c25468
Compare
…filter dependency to version 3.0 (#23) * Updating how we create BloomFilter from rdb loads. BloomFilter vec now has capacity of filter we are loading from Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> * Updating bloomfilter dependency to version 3, fixing breaking changes as well Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> * Updating the digest changes to follow updated version of bloom. As well as removing unnecesary fields saved in rdb Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> * Update log in src/bloom/data_type.rs Signed-off-by: KarthikSubbarao <[email protected]> * Update comment in src/bloom/utils.rs Signed-off-by: KarthikSubbarao <[email protected]> * Clippy error in src/bloom/data_type.rs Signed-off-by: KarthikSubbarao <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: KarthikSubbarao <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: KarthikSubbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
99c6f58
to
1b0d819
Compare
Signed-off-by: Nihal Mehta <[email protected]>
…n a non bloom key (#30) Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]>
…r structs (#24) * Updating defragmentation to defrag both bloomfiltertype and bloomfiler structs Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> * Draft: Extra debugging and more factors being defragged Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> * Updating defrag and tests to use cursors and make test more robust by getting hits Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> * Fixing merge conflicts Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> * Fixing merge conflicts with random seed. Updating defrag test to use mexists and add_items_till_capacity. Refactored metric tracking as well to reduce code repetition Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]>
…commands contain the correct acl categories (#29) Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: VanessaTang <[email protected]>
…e properties on replica nodes to match the object on the primary (#32) Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
391d947
to
8b94c17
Compare
…s get incremented in defrag test (#33) Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]>
…fail (#34) * Deflaking tests to remove chance of false positives causing tests to fail Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> * Update tests/test_bloom_command.py Co-authored-by: KarthikSubbarao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> --------- Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: KarthikSubbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nihal Mehta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
fcaad77
to
6a514bf
Compare
Signed-off-by: VanessaTang <[email protected]>
#37) Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
9859dd6
to
ab158bb
Compare
Signed-off-by: Karthik Subbarao <[email protected]>
d3d7522
to
a9b578e
Compare
Signed-off-by: KarthikSubbarao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: zackcam <[email protected]>
This is a PR which merges current changes in
unstable
into an empty branch in order to help with a review code of the entire codebase.