-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 116
[oneDPL] Add special predefined policy templates #654
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
akukanov
wants to merge
4
commits into
uxlfoundation:main
Choose a base branch
from
akukanov:add-special-predefined-policies
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5d0c3c0
Add synopsis and a short description for new policy instance templates
akukanov 682aced
Improve the wording. Add a note about exceptions.
akukanov 13afe49
Fix the RST syntax for inlined code
akukanov 502ae26
Require non-throwing construction of predefined policies
akukanov File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would we want to deprecate this policy object as well to convince people to switch to the new ones, or leave it as is?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@danhoeflinger isn't the question whether to redefine
dpcpp_defaultto be an instance ofdpdefaultinstead of deprecating it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand correctly, beyond just the name shortening, I think the other advantage here is that the new policy templates are on-demand usage and cannot cause problems for broken SYCL environments on startup with eager global queue creation. If we allow an easy path for users to continue using
dpcpp_defaultas a instance of the new template, then we perpetuate both of the things we are aiming to improve.I don't think we can just remove it, but we can deprecate it for eventual removal of the requirement to have some lazy queue creation system in oneDPL implementations. (uxlfoundation/oneDPL#1652)