Skip to content

Improve the us() date parser #184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 22, 2025

Conversation

yuankunzhang
Copy link
Contributor

@yuankunzhang yuankunzhang commented Jul 20, 2025

It now supports this GNU quirk:

str1/str2/str3 will be interpreted as [year]/[month]/[day] if str1 contains 4 or more digits; otherwise [month]/[day]/[year].

@yuankunzhang yuankunzhang force-pushed the improve-us-date-parser branch 4 times, most recently from da6b474 to b128099 Compare July 22, 2025 11:55
@cakebaker cakebaker force-pushed the improve-us-date-parser branch from b128099 to 4e94968 Compare July 22, 2025 13:09
@cakebaker cakebaker force-pushed the improve-us-date-parser branch from 4e94968 to 9f75f89 Compare July 22, 2025 13:30
@cakebaker cakebaker merged commit 324d0bc into uutils:main Jul 22, 2025
17 checks passed
@cakebaker
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks!

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (5ba4b18) to head (9f75f89).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@     Coverage Diff     @@
##   main   #184   +/-   ##
===========================
===========================

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants