WIP: DMB add package set handling to official content #364
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bdrung
reviewed
Jan 5, 2026
cpaelzer
requested review from
athos-ribeiro,
julian-klode,
lvoytek,
rkratky,
s-makin and
utkarsh2102
as code owners
Collaborator
Author
|
I've worked through the links, references, spelling checks and a bit more on the phrasing. Should now be ready for review - marking as such... |
s-makin
reviewed
Jan 6, 2026
cpaelzer
force-pushed
the
dmb-add-package-set-handling
branch
from
8454d21 to
b924467
Compare
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Drung <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Benjamin Drung <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
cpaelzer
force-pushed
the
dmb-add-package-set-handling
branch
from
b924467 to
1899462
Compare
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[email protected]>
Collaborator
Author
|
Fixed the broken redirection (thanks Sally), improved a bad paragraph that I found and added a flowchart to explain the basic data relation visually. Rebased and re-pushed |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
While discussing the changes to the server package set we realized we'd like to document that there are two types, logical (defined by description) and seed based package sets. In the long past seed based lists were generated, but that had issues, but-rot and also sometimes one wanted to add/remove some. Therefore for now this described how non-generated lists can be maintained better by describing how the DMB wants to treat them.
While getting to that I found that we didn't yet leverage the related content out of the staging area, it was still as it was in the wiki without any rewrite.
The following is picking, placing and overhauling what I think would be useful to have.
And then adding the explanation and examples how seed based sets could be checked