Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update foreman package dependencies #5735

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2020

Conversation

ekohl
Copy link
Member

@ekohl ekohl commented Aug 31, 2020

No description provided.

@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ BuildRequires: systemd
# start package.json devDependencies BuildRequires
BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}npm(@babel/core) >= 7.7.0
BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}npm(@babel/core) < 8.0.0
BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}npm(@theforeman/builder) >= 4.11.1
BuildRequires: %{?scl_prefix}npm(@theforeman/builder) >= 4.12.0
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

theforeman/foreman#7896 bumps it to 4.14 so I'm going to update this ahead of time.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you revert it back to 4.12.0 to reflect current state? This is mixing two update concerns that will block builds unless we know that the referenced PR is going in really soon.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This doesn't block the build since 4.14.0 is available (#5687). Repoclosure is only complaining about sd_notify which is because we didn't mash.

@ekohl ekohl force-pushed the rpm/update-foreman-deps branch from 0c246f7 to c2dbf9a Compare August 31, 2020 15:27
@ehelms ehelms merged commit 52f821f into theforeman:rpm/develop Sep 1, 2020
@ekohl ekohl deleted the rpm/update-foreman-deps branch September 7, 2020 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants