docs: Use correct comment characters for C# language

[HofmeisterAn]

What does this PR do?

-

Why is it important?

-

Related issues

-

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for testcontainers-dotnet ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	1cdfad8
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/projects/testcontainers-dotnet/deploys/69074a51e7eb6d0008eb782c
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-1564--testcontainers-dotnet.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

[coderabbitai]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated API documentation examples with improved formatting and corrected configuration details for better accuracy and clarity.

Walkthrough

Documentation update that modifies code examples in the Docker container API guide. Comment syntax changed from hash-based to C#-style notation, and a port exposure configuration removed from a container builder example.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Examples Update docs/api/create_docker_container.md	Updated "Copying a file" example with C#-style line comments (\\/) replacing hash-based comments (#); removed WithExposedPort(MagicNumberPort) call from container builder sequence

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Suggested labels

chore

Poem

🐰 With comments now styled like C#'s clean array,
Our Docker docs dance in a modern way,
Port configs removed with a careful hand,
Examples refined—oh, aren't they grand!
Docs polished bright, shining in the light ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request description is largely incomplete. Both mandatory sections—"What does this PR do?" and "Why is it important?"—contain only placeholder dashes with no substantive explanation of the changes or their rationale. The recommended "Related issues" section is also empty, and while optional sections are present, they provide no actionable content. The template requires at minimum a clear explanation of the changes and their importance, neither of which is provided.	The author must complete at least the two mandatory sections of the description template: fill in "What does this PR do?" with a concrete explanation of the comment syntax updates and any other changes, and complete "Why is it important?" with the rationale for these documentation corrections. Additionally, the "Related issues" section should be populated if there are any associated issues, or explicitly marked as "None" if not applicable.
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (1 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The pull request title "docs: Use correct comment characters for C# language" directly corresponds to the primary change documented in the raw summary: updating comment syntax from hash-based (#) comments to C#-style line comments (//) in a documentation file. The title is clear, specific, and accurately reflects the main focus of the changeset. While the summary also mentions a secondary change (removal of WithExposedPort), the title appropriately emphasizes the primary correction for C# documentation syntax.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch feature/update-docs

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 593912e and 1cdfad8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• docs/api/create_docker_container.md (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

docs/api/create_docker_container.md (3)

192-199: Verify the AI-generated summary claim about WithExposedPort removal.

The AI summary states that "Removed the WithExposedPort(MagicNumberPort) call from the deepThoughtContainer builder sequence," but the annotated code provided does not show ~ marks on these lines (192–199), and no WithExposedPort call is visible in the current code. This may indicate either:

1. The summary is inaccurate or referencing a different change
2. The WithExposedPort was removed in a prior commit and is not part of this PR

Please clarify whether this change is part of the current PR or if the summary is inconsistent with the actual modifications.

---

1-256: Note: PR description lacks substantive detail.

Per the PR objectives, the PR description contains only placeholder content with no explanation of what the changes accomplish, why they matter, or how to test them. Consider updating the PR description to document:

• What language syntax issue was corrected and why
• Whether there are any related issues or follow-ups
• Confirmation that all similar issues across documentation have been addressed

---

48-50: Use correct comment characters for C# language examples.

The changes from hash-based comments (#) to C#-style line comments (//) on lines 48 and 50 are correct and appropriate. Verification confirms no hash comments remain within the C# code blocks in this documentation file.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}