Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: avoid panic when reconciling namespace without owner reference #2516

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

l-qing
Copy link
Contributor

@l-qing l-qing commented Jan 16, 2025

Changes

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Release Notes

NONE

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. label Jan 16, 2025
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign puneetpunamiya after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @puneetpunamiya in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @l-qing. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a tektoncd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 16, 2025
@@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ func PipelineReady(informer informer.TektonPipelineInformer) (*v1alpha1.TektonPi
}
return nil, err
}
if ppln.GetStatus() != nil && strings.Contains(ppln.GetStatus().GetCondition(apis.ConditionReady).Message, v1alpha1.UpgradePending) {
readyCondition := ppln.GetStatus().GetCondition(apis.ConditionReady)
if readyCondition != nil && strings.Contains(readyCondition.Message, v1alpha1.UpgradePending) {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In my environment, sometimes the Pipeline has not yet been reconciled, resulting in the status being empty. At this point, entering here may trigger a panic.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@l-qing we need to keep the check ppln.GetStatus() != nil, otherwise it will panic on ppln.GetStatus().GetCondition, and refactor as you suggest ?

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ func ReconcileTargetNamespace(ctx context.Context, labels map[string]string, ann
if namespace.Name == tektonComponent.GetSpec().GetTargetNamespace() && namespace.DeletionTimestamp == nil {
_targetNamespace := namespace.DeepCopy()
targetNamespace = _targetNamespace
} else {
} else if len(namespace.GetOwnerReferences()) > 0 {
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I manually created the ns, which resulted in entering here, causing a panic.

I understand that we should not panic under any circumstances.

@pratap0007
Copy link
Contributor

/ok-to-test

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 16, 2025
@pratap0007
Copy link
Contributor

I think, if you create namespace manually it adds owner reference so in which case a target namespace would not have owner reference?

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Contributor

The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
Say /test pull-tekton-operator-go-coverage to re-run this coverage report

File Old Coverage New Coverage Delta
pkg/reconciler/common/targetnamespace.go 89.2% 89.5% 0.3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants