Skip to content

Use gh‑pages branch #24

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ExE-Boss
Copy link

This makes the build result be deployed to the gh‑pages branch.


The configuration is based on https://github.com/tc39/proposal-realms/blob/master/.github/workflows/publish.yml

@ExE-Boss ExE-Boss force-pushed the feat/use-gh-pages-branch branch from 874ee0c to 5147d13 Compare June 20, 2020 11:31
@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Jun 21, 2020

Why is this an improvement? It's simpler imo when there's only a single branch for the raw and rendered spec.

@ExE-Boss
Copy link
Author

It ensures that the master branch only contains the source files.

@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Jun 21, 2020

Right, but I find that more complex than having one branch for the entire proposal repo.

@gibson042
Copy link

I strongly agree with @ljharb about keeping all contents in a single branch, but would personally prefer use of /docs rather than dumping rendered output at the top level.

@ljharb ljharb changed the base branch from master to main August 1, 2020 21:07
@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented May 31, 2023

Closed by #32.

@ljharb ljharb closed this May 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants