Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change to
tzwcorrectly extends support to timezones with three path segments, such as 'America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires', by making the third segment(?:/\w+)?optional. This directly addresses the issue described in the pull request.A point for consideration regarding overall robustness: the pattern uses
\w+to match individual segments of the timezone name (e.g., 'America', 'Argentina', 'Buenos_Aires').\wtypically matches alphanumeric characters plus underscore ([a-zA-Z0-9_]). Some IANA timezone names can include hyphens within their segments (e.g., 'America/Port-au-Prince'). The current\w+would not correctly parse such segments; for 'America/Port-au-Prince',\w+would match 'Port', and then the regex would likely fail at the hyphen.If supporting timezones with hyphens in their path segments is within scope for this parser,
\w+might need to be broadened (e.g., to[\w-]+). Could you clarify if the current behavior of not supporting hyphens within these path segments is an acceptable limitation, or if broader support is intended?