Update pinecone.json #567
Update pinecone.json #567
Conversation
| "rag": { | ||
| "support": "", | ||
| "support": "full", | ||
| "source_url": "", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this looks like a better place for https://github.com/pinecone-io/canopy
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just realized canopy is archived, so better here is https://docs.pinecone.io/guides/assistant/quickstart
| "embeddings_image": { | ||
| "support": "none", | ||
| "support": "full", | ||
| "source_url": "", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
whats the right link for this? I realized that the models available on your inference api are just text models, so this would be none if that's the case, e.g. when I click through here:
https://docs.pinecone.io/models/overview -> https://docs.pinecone.io/models/jina-clip-v2
says "go get the vectors to a 3rd party platform"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct, we don't host those ourselves.
| "website": "https://www.pinecone.io/", | ||
| "vendor_discussion": "https://github.com/superlinked/VectorHub/discussions/65", | ||
| "poc_github": "https://github.com/jamescalam", | ||
| "poc_github": "https://www.pinecone.io/learn", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is supposed to be a point of contact - like a person we can tag in case something comes up. shall we put your handle instead of james?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| "support": "none", | ||
| "support": "full", | ||
| "source_url": "", | ||
| "comment": "" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'd add something like:
Namespaces are lightweight and easy to create & delete.
| "ephemeral": { | ||
| "support": "none", | ||
| "support": "full", | ||
| "source_url": "", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| "value": 58981168, | ||
| "source_url": "https://pypi.org/project/pinecone/", | ||
| "comment": "Stats include also depricated pinecone-client package", | ||
| "value_90_days": |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this breaks the json validation (there has to be a number) - we are investigating why the numbers don't match with what you are seeing on pypi
There was a problem hiding this comment.
reverted back to 4329779 until we fix this.
2 participants
No description provided.