Skip to content

test: apply test_override_marf_compression(..) in SortitionDB::open_i…

09f9a8b
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Draft

Feat/marf compression #6654

test: apply test_override_marf_compression(..) in SortitionDB::open_i…
09f9a8b
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Codecov / codecov/project failed Jan 14, 2026 in 1s

73.29% (target 80.00%)

View this Pull Request on Codecov

73.29% (target 80.00%)

Details

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 82.83505% with 333 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.29%. Comparing base (bc00b29) to head (09f9a8b).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/node.rs 85.08% 95 Missing ⚠️
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/storage.rs 71.69% 90 Missing ⚠️
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/bits.rs 65.30% 85 Missing ⚠️
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/test/node.rs 90.23% 25 Missing ⚠️
stacks-node/src/tests/marf/marf_compress_dyn.rs 95.78% 8 Missing ⚠️
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/test/marf.rs 88.40% 8 Missing ⚠️
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/marf.rs 82.92% 7 Missing ⚠️
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/mod.rs 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
stacks-common/src/codec/mod.rs 62.50% 3 Missing ⚠️
stacks-node/src/tests/marf/marf_compress_off.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
... and 2 more

❌ Your project check has failed because the head coverage (73.29%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6654      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    67.63%   73.29%   +5.65%     
===========================================
  Files          586      589       +3     
  Lines       362403   363477    +1074     
===========================================
+ Hits        245099   266395   +21296     
+ Misses      117304    97082   -20222     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
stacks-common/src/util/macros.rs 81.94% <ø> (+1.38%) ⬆️
stacks-node/src/tests/marf/marf_compress_on.rs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
stacks-node/src/tests/mod.rs 64.18% <ø> (-8.09%) ⬇️
stackslib/src/chainstate/burn/db/sortdb.rs 86.90% <100.00%> (+11.91%) ⬆️
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/db/mod.rs 84.61% <100.00%> (+3.10%) ⬆️
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/cache.rs 85.08% <ø> (-4.33%) ⬇️
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/test/file.rs 38.94% <ø> (ø)
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/test/mod.rs 87.87% <100.00%> (+5.78%) ⬆️
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/trie.rs 84.59% <ø> (ø)
stackslib/src/chainstate/stacks/index/trie_sql.rs 79.15% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 13 more

... and 274 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update bc00b29...09f9a8b. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.