-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
Add and refactor integration tests in DefaultShareConsumerFactoryTests #3932
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
artembilan
merged 4 commits into
spring-projects:main
from
sobychacko:shared-consumer-iteration-2
Jun 3, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -17,16 +17,21 @@ | |
package org.springframework.kafka.core; | ||
|
||
import java.time.Duration; | ||
import java.util.Arrays; | ||
import java.util.ArrayList; | ||
import java.util.Collection; | ||
import java.util.Collections; | ||
import java.util.HashMap; | ||
import java.util.List; | ||
import java.util.Map; | ||
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; | ||
import java.util.concurrent.Executors; | ||
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; | ||
|
||
import org.apache.kafka.clients.admin.Admin; | ||
import org.apache.kafka.clients.admin.AdminClient; | ||
import org.apache.kafka.clients.admin.AlterConfigOp; | ||
import org.apache.kafka.clients.admin.ConfigEntry; | ||
import org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.AcknowledgeType; | ||
import org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ShareConsumer; | ||
import org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.KafkaProducer; | ||
import org.apache.kafka.clients.producer.ProducerConfig; | ||
|
@@ -49,7 +54,7 @@ | |
* @since 4.0 | ||
*/ | ||
@EmbeddedKafka( | ||
topics = {"embedded-share-test"}, partitions = 1, | ||
topics = {"embedded-share-test", "embedded-share-distribution-test"}, partitions = 1, | ||
brokerProperties = { | ||
"unstable.api.versions.enable=true", | ||
"group.coordinator.rebalance.protocols=classic,share", | ||
|
@@ -144,7 +149,6 @@ void shouldReturnUnmodifiableListenersList() { | |
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
@SuppressWarnings("try") | ||
void integrationTestDefaultShareConsumerFactory(EmbeddedKafkaBroker broker) throws Exception { | ||
final String topic = "embedded-share-test"; | ||
final String groupId = "testGroup"; | ||
|
@@ -159,23 +163,7 @@ void integrationTestDefaultShareConsumerFactory(EmbeddedKafkaBroker broker) thro | |
producer.send(new ProducerRecord<>(topic, "key", "integration-test-value")).get(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
Map<String, Object> adminProperties = new HashMap<>(); | ||
adminProperties.put("bootstrap.servers", bootstrapServers); | ||
|
||
// For this test: force new share groups to start from the beginning of the topic. | ||
// This is NOT the same as the usual consumer auto.offset.reset; it's a group config, | ||
// so use AdminClient to set share.auto.offset.reset = earliest for our test group. | ||
try (AdminClient ignored = AdminClient.create(adminProperties)) { | ||
ConfigEntry entry = new ConfigEntry("share.auto.offset.reset", "earliest"); | ||
AlterConfigOp op = new AlterConfigOp(entry, AlterConfigOp.OpType.SET); | ||
|
||
Map<ConfigResource, Collection<AlterConfigOp>> configs = Map.of( | ||
new ConfigResource(ConfigResource.Type.GROUP, "testGroup"), Arrays.asList(op)); | ||
|
||
try (Admin admin = AdminClient.create(adminProperties)) { | ||
admin.incrementalAlterConfigs(configs).all().get(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
setShareAutoOffsetResetEarliest(bootstrapServers, groupId); | ||
|
||
var consumerProps = new HashMap<String, Object>(); | ||
consumerProps.put("bootstrap.servers", bootstrapServers); | ||
|
@@ -197,4 +185,101 @@ void integrationTestDefaultShareConsumerFactory(EmbeddedKafkaBroker broker) thro | |
consumer.close(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
void integrationTestSharedConsumersDistribution(EmbeddedKafkaBroker broker) throws Exception { | ||
String topic = "shared-consumer-dist-test"; | ||
final String groupId = "distributionTestGroup"; | ||
int recordCount = 8; | ||
List<String> consumerIds = List.of("client-dist-1", "client-dist-2"); | ||
List<String> allReceived = runSharedConsumerTest(topic, groupId, consumerIds, recordCount, broker); | ||
|
||
// Assert all records were received (no loss and no duplicates) | ||
assertThat(allReceived) | ||
.containsExactlyInAnyOrder( | ||
topic + "-value-0", | ||
topic + "-value-1", | ||
topic + "-value-2", | ||
topic + "-value-3", | ||
topic + "-value-4", | ||
topic + "-value-5", | ||
topic + "-value-6", | ||
topic + "-value-7" | ||
) | ||
.doesNotHaveDuplicates(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Runs multiple Kafka consumers in parallel using ExecutorService, collects all records received, | ||
* and returns a list of all record values received by all consumers. | ||
*/ | ||
private static List<String> runSharedConsumerTest(String topic, String groupId, | ||
List<String> consumerIds, int recordCount, EmbeddedKafkaBroker broker) throws Exception { | ||
var bootstrapServers = broker.getBrokersAsString(); | ||
|
||
var producerProps = new java.util.Properties(); | ||
producerProps.put(ProducerConfig.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS_CONFIG, bootstrapServers); | ||
producerProps.put(ProducerConfig.KEY_SERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, StringSerializer.class); | ||
producerProps.put(ProducerConfig.VALUE_SERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, StringSerializer.class); | ||
try (var producer = new KafkaProducer<String, String>(producerProps)) { | ||
for (int i = 0; i < recordCount; i++) { | ||
producer.send(new ProducerRecord<>(topic, "key" + i, topic + "-value-" + i)).get(); | ||
} | ||
producer.flush(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
setShareAutoOffsetResetEarliest(bootstrapServers, groupId); | ||
|
||
List<String> allReceived = Collections.synchronizedList(new ArrayList<>()); | ||
var latch = new java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch(recordCount); | ||
ExecutorService executor = Executors.newCachedThreadPool(); | ||
DefaultShareConsumerFactory<String, String> shareConsumerFactory = new DefaultShareConsumerFactory<>( | ||
Map.of( | ||
"bootstrap.servers", bootstrapServers, | ||
"key.deserializer", org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringDeserializer.class, | ||
"value.deserializer", org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringDeserializer.class | ||
) | ||
); | ||
for (int i = 0; i < consumerIds.size(); i++) { | ||
final int idx = i; | ||
executor.submit(() -> { | ||
try (var consumer = shareConsumerFactory.createShareConsumer(groupId, consumerIds.get(idx))) { | ||
consumer.subscribe(Collections.singletonList(topic)); | ||
while (latch.getCount() > 0) { | ||
var records = consumer.poll(Duration.ofMillis(200)); | ||
for (var r : records) { | ||
allReceived.add(r.value()); | ||
consumer.acknowledge(r, AcknowledgeType.ACCEPT); | ||
latch.countDown(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
}); | ||
} | ||
|
||
assertThat(latch.await(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS)) | ||
.as("All records should be received within timeout") | ||
.isTrue(); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We don't need all of these extra variables and even don't need to deal with |
||
executor.shutdown(); | ||
assertThat(executor.awaitTermination(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS)) | ||
.as("Executor should terminate after shutdown") | ||
.isTrue(); | ||
return allReceived; | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Sets the share.auto.offset.reset group config to earliest for the given groupId, | ||
* using the provided bootstrapServers. | ||
*/ | ||
private static void setShareAutoOffsetResetEarliest(String bootstrapServers, String groupId) throws Exception { | ||
Map<String, Object> adminProperties = new HashMap<>(); | ||
adminProperties.put("bootstrap.servers", bootstrapServers); | ||
ConfigEntry entry = new ConfigEntry("share.auto.offset.reset", "earliest"); | ||
AlterConfigOp op = new AlterConfigOp(entry, AlterConfigOp.OpType.SET); | ||
Map<ConfigResource, Collection<AlterConfigOp>> configs = Map.of( | ||
new ConfigResource(ConfigResource.Type.GROUP, groupId), List.of(op)); | ||
try (Admin admin = AdminClient.create(adminProperties)) { | ||
admin.incrementalAlterConfigs(configs).all().get(); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My idea was to move
create
andsubscribe
outside of the thread.And only
poll
in that submitted task.Doesn't that work?
Indeed it might be not related to our test case, but that how I feel consumers are supposed to be used.