Skip to content

Conversation

@bact
Copy link
Collaborator

@bact bact commented Jan 23, 2025

  • Show the version of the spec-parser currently working with
  • Add --debug --verbose to spec-parser options to print more information for the PR author to understand why the purposed changes failed the validation (if it failed)

Add --debug to spec-parser options
(--debug is supposed to be more verbose than --verbose)

Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <[email protected]>
@bact bact added the ci Dev workflow and repo management label Jan 23, 2025
@bact bact requested review from goneall, puerco and zvr January 23, 2025 10:47
Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <[email protected]>
@zvr
Copy link
Member

zvr commented Jan 23, 2025

What is the purpose of the "validation"?
I assume to make sure that the input is "correct" / "valid".

What does this mean?
More specifically:

  • errors should most definitely be flagged
  • what about warnings?

And how is it checked?

  • is only the exit code of the process?
  • or is the generated output / error messages also checked?

@bact bact changed the title Print debug information during PR validation (target: 'develop' branch) Print verbose output during PR validation (target: 'develop' branch) Jan 23, 2025
@bact
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bact commented Jan 23, 2025

If it's valid it's good.

If it's not, having some information to understand why it is the case is good.

@bact bact changed the title Print verbose output during PR validation (target: 'develop' branch) Print verbose info during PR validation (target: 'develop' branch) Jan 23, 2025
@goneall
Copy link
Member

goneall commented Oct 10, 2025

@bact - Can you rebase to trigger the CI? The old CI failed, but it is too stale to see the logs

@zvr - any concerns about merging?

@bact
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bact commented Oct 10, 2025

Thanks. I will rebase / check the parameters again to keep up with latest spec-parser.

@goneall
Copy link
Member

goneall commented Nov 14, 2025

Looks like this is still failing the CI

@bact - can you check?

@kestewart kestewart added this to the 3.1 milestone Nov 14, 2025
@bact
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bact commented Jan 21, 2026

The CI is good now. @goneall

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci Dev workflow and repo management

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants