Create npm-gulp.html

[vugule1]

Description

Type of change

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Protocol integration
• Documentation update
• Other (please describe):

Screenshots

Testing

Related Issues

Checklist

• My code follows the project's style guidelines
• I have added tests that prove my fix/feature works
• All tests pass locally and in CI
• I have updated documentation as needed
• CI/CD checks pass
• I have included screenshots for protocol screens (if applicable)
• For security-related features, I have included links to related information

Additional Notes

---

Important

Add GitHub Actions workflow for NodeJS with Gulp targeting master branch and testing multiple Node.js versions.

• Workflow:
  • Adds .github/workflows/npm-gulp.yml for NodeJS with Gulp.
  • Triggers on push and pull_request to master branch.
• Build Job:
  • Runs on ubuntu-latest.
  • Tests against Node.js versions 18.x, 20.x, 22.x.
  • Steps include actions/checkout@v4, actions/setup-node@v4, npm install, and gulp.

^{This description was created by for f6d7ca1. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

@vugule1 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Solana Foundation Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to f6d7ca1 in 1 minute and 2 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 34 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 3 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

1. .github/workflows/npm-gulp.yml:1

• Draft comment:
  PR title mentions 'npm-gulp.html' yet the file created is 'npm-gulp.yml'. Please verify and update the title or file name accordingly.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% This comment violates several rules. First, it's asking for a PR title update, which is explicitly against our rules. Second, it's not about the actual code changes or logic, but about metadata. Third, even if there is a mismatch, it's not a functional issue - the workflow file is clearly a valid YAML file for GitHub Actions. Maybe the filename mismatch could indicate a deeper misunderstanding or error in the PR's purpose? No, the file is clearly a properly formatted GitHub Actions workflow file. The extension being .yml is correct, and any PR title mismatch is irrelevant to the code review. Delete this comment as it violates our rules about not requesting PR metadata updates and focuses on non-functional aspects.

2. .github/workflows/npm-gulp.yml:25

• Draft comment:
  Consider adding caching for npm dependencies to improve CI build performance.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Confidence changes required: 50% <= threshold 50% None

3. .github/workflows/npm-gulp.yml:1

• Draft comment:
  The changes in this workflow do not address issue #123 (transaction history for deleted accounts). Please ensure the PR description matches the changes.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50% This comment is asking the PR author to ensure the PR description matches the changes, which violates the rule against asking for PR description updates. Additionally, it suggests that the changes do not address a specific issue, but it does not provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a test. Therefore, it should be removed.

Workflow ID: wflow_dho4ya3s9Dy1PnVN

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}

[rogaldh]

Is this relevant? Looks like it is not.

[rogaldh]

@jacobcreech looks unrelated. Should it be closed?