Skip to content

Issues: softwarepub/software-card-policies

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort

Issues list

What should validation reports look like Specification Issues related to the specification
#23 opened Jan 31, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Multiple stages of policy definition/parameterization/configuration Specification Issues related to the specification
#22 opened Jan 28, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Provide collection of policies as Python package? Research Topics that need to be researched and evaluated
#21 opened Jan 28, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Caching of policies/RDF files possible? Implementation Issues related to the concrete implementation of the spec (e.g. in the validator tool or the plugin)
#20 opened Jan 28, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Idea: checksums for policies / configs Implementation Issues related to the concrete implementation of the spec (e.g. in the validator tool or the plugin) Specification Issues related to the specification
#19 opened Jan 28, 2025 by poikilotherm
Pass config file on the command line Implementation Issues related to the concrete implementation of the spec (e.g. in the validator tool or the plugin)
#18 opened Jan 27, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Policies with mandatory configuration values? Implementation Issues related to the concrete implementation of the spec (e.g. in the validator tool or the plugin) Specification Issues related to the specification
#16 opened Jan 27, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Security implications of using JavaScript features Research Topics that need to be researched and evaluated
#15 opened Jan 24, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Provide Python library with spec or later? Implementation Issues related to the concrete implementation of the spec (e.g. in the validator tool or the plugin) Specification Issues related to the specification
#14 opened Jan 24, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Create a report from validation results Implementation Issues related to the concrete implementation of the spec (e.g. in the validator tool or the plugin)
#13 opened Jan 21, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Decide namespace prefixes and URIs Specification Issues related to the specification
#12 opened Jan 21, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Decide on terminology and definitions Specification Issues related to the specification
#11 opened Jan 21, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Interpolation of policy description from parameter? Implementation Issues related to the concrete implementation of the spec (e.g. in the validator tool or the plugin) Specification Issues related to the specification
#10 opened Jan 21, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Naming scheme for policy parameters in config file Implementation Issues related to the concrete implementation of the spec (e.g. in the validator tool or the plugin) Specification Issues related to the specification
#9 opened Jan 21, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Alternatives to current parametrization approach? Research Topics that need to be researched and evaluated
#8 opened Jan 21, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Discuss versioning of policies and sc: components Specification Issues related to the specification
#7 opened Jan 20, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Add examples and usage notes using VANN ontology Specification Issues related to the specification
#6 opened Jan 20, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Annotate policies with labels, comments, authors Specification Issues related to the specification
#5 opened Jan 20, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Evaluate usage of SHACL default values to generate suggestions Research Topics that need to be researched and evaluated
#4 opened Jan 20, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Evaluate usage of SHACL groups Research Topics that need to be researched and evaluated
#3 opened Jan 20, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
Evaluate usage of (custom) SHACL severities Research Topics that need to be researched and evaluated
#2 opened Jan 20, 2025 by zyzzyxdonta
ProTip! Type g i on any issue or pull request to go back to the issue listing page.