Conversation
|
Please wait with review - it was working in debug-environment, but with the final build on our stage-environment the order seems to be wrong again; I'm currently trying to figure out what's wrong... |
|
Sure. I was planning to remove display_timestamp in future releases. It was
added initially as an option to show source timestamp. With message format
support , this can be added as part of message if required. Logtrail will
only use timestamp to filter and display in first column. I need to
evaluate few more use cases and confirm.
…On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 17:32 derandreasberger ***@***.***> wrote:
Please wait with review - it was working in debug-environment, but with
the final build on our stage-environment the order seems to be wrong again;
I'm currently trying to figure out what's wrong...
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#184 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABZXeqrZ6TJUVxoP3OmfaDRWVBcQGEm1ks5skP7WgaJpZM4Pds0h>
.
|
|
@sivasamyk the branch is ok (besides the merge-conflict)! I just verified the live-tail and search works on our stage with enabled utc-flag (it was just that kibana is optimizing/bundling plugins which i was not aware of, so i neede to manually purge the cached bundle-js files for logtrail). Here is the actual configuration I used for testing: As long as the newly introduced flags display_timestamp_force_sort are not active the default-behaviour should not be affected, but my testing was focused on UTC due to our use-case. |
|
@derandreasberger Thanks for pull request. Will review and let you know my comments! |
Hello! Please let me know how if you want to make a 5.5.3 build or if I should take care of a proper build myself (we need 5.5.3 due to ES SaaS constraints).