forked from mit-pdos/xv6-riscv
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
Update sources to upstream mit-pdos version (#39) #46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
e1turin
wants to merge
93
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
39-upd-upstream
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
off if they should previously have been on.
This reverts commit 2e72ada.
There is a buffer overflow in printint function which can be triggered if numbers with more than 16 digits are written to the terminal. Numbers 18446744073709551615 and -9223372036854775808 both have 20 digits for instance. To this extent, I increased the buffer size to 20 characters which can fit base 10 of all 64 bit numbers (negative or positive).
There is a buffer overflow in printint function which can be triggered if numbers with more than 16 digits are written to the terminal. Numbers 18446744073709551615 and -9223372036854775808 both have 20 digits for instance. To this extent, I increased the buffer size to 20 characters which can fit base 10 of all 64 bit numbers (negative or positive).
interrupts. I recently got a panic caused by this (process moved to a different core between mycpu() and ->noff). also, make panic msg printing more robust if mycpu()->noff or locks are broken.
sbrk() is the eager version Speedup countfree() by using eager allocation Simplify some usertests by using eager allocation
sbrk already uses it
no more typing 0xffffffffffffffffLL
kernel sys_sleep() -> sys_pause() kernel fork() -> kfork() kernel exec() -> kexec() kernel wait() -> kwait() kernel exit() -> kexit() kernel kill() -> kkill() SYS_sleep -> SYS_pause
@vityaman we need to update riscv toolchain |
This was referenced Sep 21, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.