chore: adopt PEP-639 license metadata format #328
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Replace classifiers-based license declaration with PEP-639 style. Also, declaration of BSD License has been removed, as it appears to have been included accidentally.
tkng
force-pushed
the
chore/pep-639-license
branch
from
c6e10c9 to
83747ec
Compare
remove meaningless and strange changes
|
Sorry for the commit history becoming messed up. If I need to squash the history on my end, I'll recreate the pull request. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Replace classifiers-based license declaration with PEP-639 style.
Also, declaration of BSD license has been removed, as it appears to have been included accidentally.
I guess that the BSD license declaration in the metadata is unintentional, because
LICENSE_Apache_20. There is noLICENSE_BSD.Adding a license is a significant change. If it were intentional, it should have been documented in the commit message. The absence of such mention suggests that it was not an intentional change.