Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tweak code that uses refined so that it compiles with Scala 3 #3526

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

fthomas
Copy link
Member

@fthomas fthomas commented Jan 6, 2025

This is in preparation for compiling with Scala 3 and probably the last chunk from #2065 that gets its own PR.

... which is not available in Scala 3.
I had problems replacing `Witness.Aux` with a Scala 3 equivalent that
make the code compile, so I rewrote this function without refined.
@fthomas fthomas added this to the 0.32.2 milestone Jan 6, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.73%. Comparing base (dd4b207) to head (a84aba9).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...la/org/scalasteward/core/application/Context.scala 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3526   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.73%   89.73%           
=======================================
  Files         171      171           
  Lines        3536     3537    +1     
  Branches      321      330    +9     
=======================================
+ Hits         3173     3174    +1     
  Misses        363      363           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fthomas fthomas merged commit a35f3dc into main Jan 7, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@fthomas fthomas deleted the topic/tweak-refined-code branch January 7, 2025 13:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants