-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 161
Triage 2024 08 29 #1970
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Triage 2024 08 29 #1970
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ | ||
| # 2024-08-29 Triage Log | ||
|
|
||
| Not a bad week. More improvements than regressions. | ||
|
|
||
| Triage done by **@pnkfelix**. | ||
| Revision range: [4fe1e2bd..acb4e8b6](https://perf.rust-lang.org/?start=4fe1e2bd5bf5a6f1cb245f161a5e9d315766f103&end=acb4e8b6251f1d8da36f08e7a70fa23fc581839e&absolute=false&stat=instructions%3Au) | ||
|
|
||
| **Summary**: | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:-----:|:---------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | 0.5% | [0.2%, 2.3%] | 25 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | 1.1% | [0.1%, 1.9%] | 16 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | -1.4% | [-10.4%, -0.2%] | 54 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | -2.6% | [-8.1%, -0.3%] | 56 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | -0.8% | [-10.4%, 2.3%] | 79 | | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| 5 Regressions, 3 Improvements, 3 Mixed; 5 of them in rollups | ||
| 44 artifact comparisons made in total | ||
|
|
||
| #### Regressions | ||
|
|
||
| Update stdarch submodule [#128866](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/128866) [(Comparison Link)](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=4d7c095832494257a9f57e13fd151a9d4f5c6851&end=59a74db37df8628f778faf75faa41958bb07a42a&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:----:|:------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | 0.3% | [0.2%, 0.5%] | 2 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | 0.2% | [0.1%, 0.7%] | 14 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | 0.3% | [0.2%, 0.5%] | 2 | | ||
|
|
||
| * primary regressions are to cratelift-codegen llvm-opt-full and helloworld llvm-doc-full | ||
| * from the graphs, the cranelift regression looks like a blip, and the helloworld regression seems tiny compared to other changes in its history -- I infer the auto-computed significance threshold is quite low here, probably because historically the build time for helloworld is very stable? | ||
| * In any case, doesn't seem worth investigating. Marking as triaged. | ||
|
|
||
| Rollup of 9 pull requests [#129365](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129365) [(Comparison Link)](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=a32d4a0e822a29a6682e08b75a8df4c29c7fa9f1&end=739b1fdb158a3216d1b592d0d79d77d256f59815&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:----:|:------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | 0.3% | [0.2%, 0.4%] | 15 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | 0.3% | [0.2%, 0.4%] | 15 | | ||
|
|
||
| * primary regressions are solely to various incr-patched scenarios | ||
| * confirmed that PR #127279 is root cause | ||
| * note that PR #127279 is addressing an issue in incr-comp; it might be expected that it would cause some incr-comp benchmarks to be impacted. | ||
| * left some comments and marked as triaged. | ||
|
|
||
| Rollup of 9 pull requests [#129521](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129521) [(Comparison Link)](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=697d9530d78aeba31458cadfc338adb2aea90bee&end=717aec0f8eebdc5eb51756e5129dde15e8b25710&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:----:|:------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | 0.7% | [0.4%, 0.9%] | 6 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | 0.7% | [0.4%, 0.9%] | 6 | | ||
|
|
||
| * primary regressions are solely to various incremental scenarios for the bitmaps crate | ||
| * PR #129513 and PR #129546 seem to have recovered much of the losses here... but after review, they are probably just masking the loss introduced by PR #129521 | ||
| * opened [discussion in zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/247081-t-compiler.2Fperformance/topic/numeric.20precision.20in.20rustc-perf.20detailed.20results/near/466074054) about how to actually dig more deeply into regressions like this. | ||
| * nothing here seems like it should have impacted incr-comp, and this regression seems minor enough that it does not warrant deeper investigation | ||
| * marking as triaged | ||
|
|
||
| Rollup of 9 pull requests [#129632](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129632) [(Comparison Link)](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=515395af0efdbdd657ff08a1f6d28e553856654f&end=bf662eb80838008acabc307dd64d84935ce3a20d&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:----:|:------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | 1.4% | [0.6%, 2.3%] | 2 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | 1.4% | [0.6%, 2.3%] | 2 | | ||
|
|
||
| * primary doc-full regressions to typenum and stm32f4 | ||
| * the regression for typenum's walltime is flagged as significant as well. | ||
| * the self-profile results for typenum imply that we are spending more time in create_renderer | ||
| * enqueued a rust-timer run against PR #192560 which is the most obvious candidate as a rustdoc change | ||
|
|
||
| Implement a first version of RFC 3525: struct target features [#127537](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127537) [(Comparison Link)](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=100fde5246bf56f22fb5cc85374dd841296fce0e&end=acb4e8b6251f1d8da36f08e7a70fa23fc581839e&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:----:|:------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | 0.4% | [0.2%, 1.0%] | 72 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | 0.7% | [0.2%, 2.2%] | 19 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | 0.4% | [0.2%, 1.0%] | 72 | | ||
|
|
||
| * this is being actively investigated by the PR author after getting feedback from @nnethercote | ||
| * not marking as triaged | ||
|
|
||
| #### Improvements | ||
|
|
||
| Rollup of 9 pull requests [#129331](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129331) [(Comparison Link)](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=5aea14073eee9e403c3bb857490cd6aa4a395531&end=4d7c095832494257a9f57e13fd151a9d4f5c6851&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:-----:|:---------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | -3.2% | [-10.3%, -0.5%] | 19 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | -5.0% | [-7.4%, -1.4%] | 21 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | -3.2% | [-10.3%, -0.5%] | 19 | | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Do not call source_span when not tracking dependencies. [#129513](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129513) [(Comparison Link)](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=600edc948ab5de7a92538bcc2f49cb8d47925e2d&end=ab869e094a907cc5d19b4080f22eccaf347f1f95&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:-----:|:--------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | -0.3% | [-0.4%, -0.2%] | 20 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | -0.2% | [-0.2%, -0.2%] | 3 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | -0.3% | [-0.4%, -0.2%] | 20 | | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| Get rid of `predicates_defined_on` [#129546](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129546) [(Comparison Link)](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=d9a2cc4daee38c63b2f69710ed61d40acc32b709&end=748c54848dc2964b7e133f945cabe5bc64079947&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:-----:|:--------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | 3.2% | [3.2%, 3.2%] | 1 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | -0.4% | [-1.3%, -0.2%] | 108 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | -0.7% | [-2.0%, -0.1%] | 68 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | -0.4% | [-1.3%, -0.2%] | 108 | | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| #### Mixed | ||
|
|
||
| Rollup of 6 pull requests [#129275](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129275) [(Comparison Link)](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=5601d14249818d952da612fec481b7af3ed03a39&end=636d7ff91b9847d6d43c7bbe023568828f6e3246&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:-----:|:--------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | 0.2% | [0.2%, 0.2%] | 1 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | 0.2% | [0.2%, 0.2%] | 8 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | -1.0% | [-1.0%, -1.0%] | 1 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | 0.2% | [0.2%, 0.2%] | 1 | | ||
|
|
||
| * sole primary regression is to helloworld doc-full. | ||
| * marked as triaged. | ||
|
|
||
| Don't generate functions with the `rustc_intrinsic_must_be_overridden` attribute [#129239](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129239) [(Comparison Link)](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=a971212545766fdfe0dd68e5d968133f79944a19&end=4d5b3b196284aded6ae99d12bcf149ffdc8ef379&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:-----:|:--------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | 0.2% | [0.2%, 0.2%] | 1 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | -0.3% | [-0.3%, -0.2%] | 2 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | -1.3% | [-2.2%, -0.6%] | 6 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | -0.1% | [-0.3%, 0.2%] | 3 | | ||
|
|
||
| * sole primary regression is to html5ever opt-full | ||
| * from inspecting the PR, its hard to imagine doing this in a better way, and Isuspect the reported regression is noise. | ||
| * marked as triaged | ||
|
|
||
| Add a precondition check for Layout::from_size_align_unchecked [#126556](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/126556) [(Comparison Link)](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=59a74db37df8628f778faf75faa41958bb07a42a&end=982c6f8721416431ec62bb0b9105c0578a9fc603&stat=instructions:u) | ||
|
|
||
| | (instructions:u) | mean | range | count | | ||
| |:----------------------------------:|:-----:|:--------------:|:-----:| | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | 1.3% | [1.1%, 1.5%] | 3 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | -0.3% | [-0.5%, -0.2%] | 9 | | ||
| | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | - | - | 0 | | ||
| | All ❌✅ (primary) | -0.3% | [-0.5%, -0.2%] | 9 | | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| * this PR went through significant microoptimization during develoment and review | ||
| * also, already marked as triaged | ||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.