Skip to content

Conversation

spastorino
Copy link
Member

Closes #71694

Takes over again #72029 and #74971

cc @RalfJung @oli-obk @pnkfelix @eddyb as they've participated in previous reviews of this PR.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @eddyb

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 20, 2020
@spastorino spastorino force-pushed the separate-unsized-locals branch from 927b11a to d3a17af Compare October 20, 2020 20:26
@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Oct 20, 2020

r? @pnkfelix (as per #72029 and #74971)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned pnkfelix and unassigned eddyb Oct 20, 2020
@spastorino
Copy link
Member Author

@RalfJung have addressed all your comments, let me know if there's something else to fix.

@spastorino
Copy link
Member Author

@RalfJung all your new comments are addressed

@spastorino spastorino requested a review from RalfJung October 21, 2020 10:54
@spastorino spastorino force-pushed the separate-unsized-locals branch 2 times, most recently from 7566c3d to 61d9745 Compare October 21, 2020 11:09
@spastorino spastorino requested a review from RalfJung October 21, 2020 11:11
@RalfJung
Copy link
Member

LGTM except for that question around the tests.

However, I cannot review the analysis changes here, I have no familiarity with that code. Hopefully @pnkfelix can take care of that. :)

@spastorino spastorino force-pushed the separate-unsized-locals branch from 685a795 to 397777b Compare October 21, 2020 11:56
@spastorino spastorino force-pushed the separate-unsized-locals branch from 397777b to cc9ab1c Compare October 27, 2020 17:46
@spastorino
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased again to solve conflicts.

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Oct 27, 2020

I think Felix has his hands full this week. I went over the code one more time, can't see any reason not to merge now

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Oct 27, 2020

📌 Commit cc9ab1c has been approved by oli-obk

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 27, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2020
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#78152 (Separate unsized locals)
 - rust-lang#78297 (Suggest calling await on method call and field access)
 - rust-lang#78351 (Move "mutable thing in const" check from interning to validity)
 - rust-lang#78365 (check object safety of generic constants)
 - rust-lang#78379 (Tweak invalid `fn` header and body parsing)
 - rust-lang#78391 (Add const_fn in generics test)
 - rust-lang#78401 (resolve: private fields in tuple struct ctor diag)
 - rust-lang#78408 (Remove tokens from foreign items in `TokenStripper`)
 - rust-lang#78447 (Fix typo in  comment)
 - rust-lang#78453 (Fix typo in comments)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
@bors bors merged commit 346aeef into rust-lang:master Oct 28, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.49.0 milestone Oct 28, 2020
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/glacier that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2020
Alexendoo added a commit to rust-lang/glacier that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Separate unsized_locals into "sound" and "unsound" (i.e. incorrectly implemented) parts
8 participants