Skip to content

Conversation

Centril
Copy link
Contributor

@Centril Centril commented Mar 26, 2019

Includes #59295 and by extension #59047, which unblocks #58253, #58837, and possibly #59336, and so therefore:

@bors p=50

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

cc @pietroalbini

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 26, 2019
@Centril
Copy link
Contributor Author

Centril commented Mar 26, 2019

@bors p=50

@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 26, 2019

📌 Commit d976dbe has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 26, 2019
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 26, 2019

⌛ Testing commit d976dbe with merge 07d3508...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 26, 2019
…crum

Bump bootstrap compiler to 2019-03-20

Includes #59295 and by extension #59047, which unblocks #58253, #58837, and possibly #59336, and so therefore:

@bors p=50

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

cc @pietroalbini
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 26, 2019

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 07d3508 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 26, 2019
@bors bors merged commit d976dbe into rust-lang:master Mar 26, 2019
@Centril Centril deleted the bootstrap-to-2019-03-20 branch March 26, 2019 17:25
This was referenced Mar 26, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants