Skip to content

Conversation

ljedrz
Copy link
Contributor

@ljedrz ljedrz commented Sep 24, 2018

  • turn a loop into a while let
  • turn a push_back loop into an extend
  • turn a few push loops into collected iterators
  • prefer vec![x; n] to (0..n).map(|_| x).collect()
  • combine two loops doing the same thing on 2 data sets using chain
  • use unwrap_or where applicable and readable
  • add a potentially_plural_count helper function to simplify several format!() calls
  • prefer to_owned to to_string for string literals
  • change match to if let where only one branch matters
  • a few other minor improvements
  • whitespace fixes

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @davidtwco

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 24, 2018
@davidtwco

This comment has been minimized.

@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 24, 2018
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 25, 2018
@ljedrz

This comment has been minimized.

@davidtwco

This comment has been minimized.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 25, 2018
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 25, 2018
@ljedrz ljedrz force-pushed the cleanup_librustc_typeck_check branch from 809659b to db69d47 Compare September 26, 2018 08:05
@ljedrz

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-highfive

This comment has been minimized.

@ljedrz ljedrz force-pushed the cleanup_librustc_typeck_check branch from db69d47 to 3ed773a Compare September 26, 2018 09:00
@ljedrz

This comment has been minimized.

@davidtwco

This comment has been minimized.

@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 26, 2018
@bors

This comment has been minimized.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 26, 2018
kennytm added a commit to kennytm/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2018
…davis

A few cleanups and minor improvements to typeck

This PR complements rust-lang#54533, which was limited to `check`.

- change a few `push` loops to `extend`s
- prefer `to_owned` to `to_string` for string literals
- prefer `if let` to `match` where only one branch matters
- a few other minor improvements
- whitespace fixes
@ljedrz ljedrz force-pushed the cleanup_librustc_typeck_check branch from 3ed773a to 3527276 Compare September 27, 2018 08:18
@ljedrz
Copy link
Contributor Author

ljedrz commented Sep 27, 2018

Rebased.

@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 27, 2018

📌 Commit 3527276 has been approved by davidtwco

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 27, 2018
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 27, 2018

⌛ Testing commit 3527276 with merge f1694ea...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 27, 2018
A few cleanups and minor improvements to typeck/check

- turn a `loop` into a `while let`
- turn a `push_back` loop into an `extend`
- turn a few `push` loops into collected iterators
- prefer `vec![x; n]` to `(0..n).map(|_| x).collect()`
- combine two loops doing the same thing on 2 data sets using `chain`
- use `unwrap_or` where applicable and readable
- add a `potentially_plural_count` helper function to simplify several `format!()` calls
- prefer `to_owned` to `to_string` for string literals
- change `match` to `if let` where only one branch matters
- a few other minor improvements
- whitespace fixes
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 27, 2018

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: davidtwco
Pushing f1694ea to master...

@bors bors merged commit 3527276 into rust-lang:master Sep 27, 2018
@ljedrz ljedrz deleted the cleanup_librustc_typeck_check branch September 27, 2018 20:50
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2018
A few cleanups and minor improvements to typeck

This PR complements #54533, which was limited to `check`.

- change a few `push` loops to `extend`s
- prefer `to_owned` to `to_string` for string literals
- prefer `if let` to `match` where only one branch matters
- a few other minor improvements
- whitespace fixes
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants