Skip to content

Conversation

@Enselic
Copy link
Member

@Enselic Enselic commented Jan 1, 2026

Since it's a bit annoying to have different names for the same thing.

My understanding is that this is just internal stuff that is not part of any public API even tough rust-analyzer knows about it.

Continuation of

Discovered while investigating

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 1, 2026

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing

cc @jdonszelmann

rust-analyzer is developed in its own repository. If possible, consider making this change to rust-lang/rust-analyzer instead.

cc @rust-lang/rust-analyzer

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift

cc @bjorn3

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc

cc @antoyo, @GuillaumeGomez

@rustbot rustbot added A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rust-analyzer Relevant to the rust-analyzer team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output. labels Jan 1, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 1, 2026

r? @jackh726

rustbot has assigned @jackh726.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@BoxyUwU
Copy link
Member

BoxyUwU commented Jan 7, 2026

r? BoxyUwU

@bors r+ rollup

I assume the r-a side is fine since people have reviewed it :> it certainly doesn't seem egregiously wrong to me

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2026

📌 Commit 634c333 has been approved by BoxyUwU

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 7, 2026
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2026

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 1000. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Jan 7, 2026

📌 Commit 634c333 has been approved by BoxyUwU

It is now in the queue for this repository.

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 50. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 7, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Jan 7, 2026

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #150645) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

This pull request was unapproved.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2026

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #150645) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 8, 2026

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

@Enselic
Copy link
Member Author

Enselic commented Jan 8, 2026

Trivial rebase.

@bors r=BoxyUwU

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Jan 8, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Jan 8, 2026

📌 Commit 9e00663 has been approved by BoxyUwU

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Jan 8, 2026
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
Finish transition from `semitransparent` to `semiopaque` for `rustc_macro_transparency`

Since it's a bit annoying to have different names for the same thing.

My understanding is that this is just internal stuff that is not part of any public API even tough rust-analyzer knows about it.

Continuation of
- rust-lang#139084.

Discovered while investigating
- rust-lang#150514
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
Finish transition from `semitransparent` to `semiopaque` for `rustc_macro_transparency`

Since it's a bit annoying to have different names for the same thing.

My understanding is that this is just internal stuff that is not part of any public API even tough rust-analyzer knows about it.

Continuation of
- rust-lang#139084.

Discovered while investigating
- rust-lang#150514
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
Finish transition from `semitransparent` to `semiopaque` for `rustc_macro_transparency`

Since it's a bit annoying to have different names for the same thing.

My understanding is that this is just internal stuff that is not part of any public API even tough rust-analyzer knows about it.

Continuation of
- rust-lang#139084.

Discovered while investigating
- rust-lang#150514
rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #150272 (docs(core): update `find()` and `rfind()` examples)
 - #150385 (fix `Expr::can_have_side_effects` for `[x; N]` style array literal and binary expressions)
 - #150561 (Finish transition from `semitransparent` to `semiopaque` for `rustc_macro_transparency`)
 - #150574 (Clarify `MoveData::init_loc_map`.)
 - #150762 (Use functions more in rustdoc GUI tests)
 - #150808 (rename the `derive_{eq, clone_copy}` features to `*_internals`)
 - #150816 (Fix trait method anchor disappearing before user can click on it)
 - #150821 (tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed))
 - #150829 (make attrs actually use `Target::GenericParam`)
 - #150834 (Add tracking issue for `feature(multiple_supertrait_upcastable)`)
 - #150864 (The aarch64-unknown-none target requires NEON, so the docs were wrong.)

r? @ghost
@rust-bors rust-bors bot merged commit 3daf993 into rust-lang:main Jan 9, 2026
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Jan 9, 2026
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2026
Rollup merge of #150561 - semiopaque, r=BoxyUwU

Finish transition from `semitransparent` to `semiopaque` for `rustc_macro_transparency`

Since it's a bit annoying to have different names for the same thing.

My understanding is that this is just internal stuff that is not part of any public API even tough rust-analyzer knows about it.

Continuation of
- #139084.

Discovered while investigating
- #150514
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2026
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang/rust#150272 (docs(core): update `find()` and `rfind()` examples)
 - rust-lang/rust#150385 (fix `Expr::can_have_side_effects` for `[x; N]` style array literal and binary expressions)
 - rust-lang/rust#150561 (Finish transition from `semitransparent` to `semiopaque` for `rustc_macro_transparency`)
 - rust-lang/rust#150574 (Clarify `MoveData::init_loc_map`.)
 - rust-lang/rust#150762 (Use functions more in rustdoc GUI tests)
 - rust-lang/rust#150808 (rename the `derive_{eq, clone_copy}` features to `*_internals`)
 - rust-lang/rust#150816 (Fix trait method anchor disappearing before user can click on it)
 - rust-lang/rust#150821 (tests/ui/borrowck/issue-92157.rs: Remove (bug not fixed))
 - rust-lang/rust#150829 (make attrs actually use `Target::GenericParam`)
 - rust-lang/rust#150834 (Add tracking issue for `feature(multiple_supertrait_upcastable)`)
 - rust-lang/rust#150864 (The aarch64-unknown-none target requires NEON, so the docs were wrong.)

r? @ghost
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rust-analyzer Relevant to the rust-analyzer team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc-frontend Relevant to the rustdoc-frontend team, which will review and decide on the web UI/UX output.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants