Skip to content

Make tests/ui/abi/debug.rs cross-compile #143464

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 7, 2025

Conversation

workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

@workingjubilee workingjubilee commented Jul 5, 2025

Resumption of #141979, making the test cross-compile.

@YingkaiLi-VM My apologies if this is undesired. 64bec0f was the two lines of difference needed. Feel free to reopen a new version of your PR if you would rather rebase and fix it up again.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 5, 2025

r? @oli-obk

rustbot has assigned @oli-obk.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 5, 2025
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@workingjubilee workingjubilee force-pushed the make-debug-rs-cross-compile branch from 2f41577 to 64bec0f Compare July 5, 2025 01:14
@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

Two lines.

@YingkaiLi-VM
Copy link
Contributor

@workingjubilee As a newcomer to the Rust community and related work, I realize our PR discussions might have contained some miscommunications – I sincerely appreciate your time and patience throughout. Thank you especially for your revisions to the PR!
Could you clarify whether I still need to make any changes to it?
Truly appreciate your guidance.

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member Author

@YingkaiLi-VM If you are happy with this PR as it is then you need do nothing. My apologies again for the confusion.

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 7, 2025

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 7, 2025

📌 Commit 64bec0f has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 7, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #143130 (doc(std): clarify `NonZero<T>` usage limitation in doc comment)
 - #143415 (Get rid of build-powerpc64le-toolchain.sh)
 - #143464 (Make tests/ui/abi/debug.rs cross-compile)
 - #143482 (Fix short linker error output)
 - #143524 (Move `stable_mir` back to its own crate)
 - #143528 (interpret: rename StackPopCleanup)
 - #143551 (Dont resolve instance of root in `mir_callgraph_cyclic`)
 - #143558 (mbe: Refactors and function extractions in `compile_declarative_macro`)
 - #143563 (std: fix typo in `std::path`)
 - #143564 (compiler: Deduplicate `must_emit_unwind_tables()` comments)
 - #143577 (Disable download-rustc for library profile)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit fc13c96 into rust-lang:master Jul 7, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.90.0 milestone Jul 7, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2025
Rollup merge of #143464 - workingjubilee:make-debug-rs-cross-compile, r=oli-obk

Make tests/ui/abi/debug.rs cross-compile

Resumption of #141979, making the test cross-compile.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants